In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion: Relationship Between CT Hounsfield Units and Symptomatic Pseudoarthrosis

    Final Number:
    1193

    Authors:
    Ha Nguyen MD; Saman Shabani BS, MD; Mohit Patel; Dennis J. Maiman MD

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2016 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Assessment of bone quality can guide spinal surgery. However, surgeons infrequently evaluate bone quality in a quantitative manner. Recent literature suggests a role for CT Hounsfield Units (HU) as a marker for bone quality. Limited data exist regarding its utility with respect to posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF).

    Methods: From Fall 2010 to Winter 2012, ten patients underwent revision surgery for symptomatic pseudoarthrosis (defined as intractable pain associated with either radiographic evidence of nonunion or intraoperative evidence of nonunion) after a prior L4-S1 PLF. These patients were age-matched (+/-5 years) to ten patients who underwent L4-S1 PLF with no clinical signs of pseudoarthrosis at 1-year follow-up. Available CT imaging (with or without instrumentation) was evaluated from L1 to L5 for the averaged HU. Data were pooled among L1-L2-L3 values and between L4-L5 values.

    Results: Within the pseudoarthrosis group, the pooled L1-L3 HU value was similar to the pooled L4-L5 HU value (168.39+/-22.84 HU versus 166.98+/-23.20 HU respectively, p = 0.89). The same pattern was observed for the control group (190.24+/-37.13 HU versus 201.89+/-36.59 HU respectively, p = 0.44). On the other hand, the pooled L1-L3 and L4-L5 HU values were larger for the control group compared to the pseudoarthrosis group, with the pooled L4-L5 HU demonstrating statistical significance, p = 0.01.

    Conclusions: Currently, CT imaging is typically not obtained prior to lumbar fusion. Results demonstrated that CT HU values were significantly larger for patients who did not exhibit symptomatic pseudoarthrosis at one-year follow-up compared to those who required revision surgery. As such, CT HU values may serve as a predictor for bony fusion to guide surgical management of patients under consideration for PLF.

    Patient Care: Discusses use of CT HU values as potential predictor for bone fusion, which helps clinical management of spinal fusion

    Learning Objectives: 1) Appreciate the potential role of CT HU values for the evaluation of bone quality 2) Appreciate the potential role of CT HU values for the assessment of bone fusion

    References: [1] DeWald CJ, Stanley T. Instrumentation-related complications of multilevel fusions for adult spinal deformity patients over age 65: surgical considerations and treatment options in patients with poor bone quality. Spine 2006;31(19 Suppl):S144-51. [2] Dimar JR, 2nd, Glassman SD, Burkus JK, Pryor PW, Hardacker JW, Carreon LY. Clinical and radiographic analysis of an optimized rhBMP-2 formulation as an autograft replacement in posterolateral lumbar spine arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91(6):1377-86. [3] Dipaola CP, Bible JE, Biswas D, Dipaola M, Grauer JN, Rechtine GR. Survey of spine surgeons on attitudes regarding osteoporosis and osteomalacia screening and treatment for fractures, fusion surgery, and pseudoarthrosis. The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society 2009;9(7):537-44. [4] Galimberti F, Lubelski D, Healy AT, Wang T, Abdullah KG, Nowacki AS, Benzel EC, Mroz TE. A Systematic Review of Lumbar Fusion Rates With and Without the Use of rhBMP-2. Spine 2015;40(14):1132-9. [5] Glassman SD, Anagnost SC, Parker A, Burke D, Johnson JR, Dimar JR. The effect of cigarette smoking and smoking cessation on spinal fusion. Spine 2000;25(20):2608-15. [6] Groff MW, Dailey AT, Ghogawala Z, Resnick DK, Watters WC, 3rd, Mummaneni PV, Choudhri TF, Eck JC, Sharan A, Wang JC, Dhall SS, Kaiser MG. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 12: pedicle screw fixation as an adjunct to posterolateral fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2014;21(1):75-8. [7] Lee CS, Chung SS, Choi SW, Yu JW, Sohn MS. Critical length of fusion requiring additional fixation to prevent nonunion of the lumbosacral junction. Spine 2010;35(6):E206-11. [8] Meredith DS, Schreiber JJ, Taher F, Cammisa FP, Jr., Girardi FP. Lower preoperative Hounsfield unit measurements are associated with adjacent segment fracture after spinal fusion. Spine 2013;38(5):415-8. [9] Schreiber JJ, Anderson PA, Rosas HG, Buchholz AL, Au AG. Hounsfield units for assessing bone mineral density and strength: a tool for osteoporosis management. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93(11):1057-63. [10] Schreiber JJ, Hughes AP, Taher F, Girardi FP. An association can be found between hounsfield units and success of lumbar spine fusion. HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery 2014;10(1):25-9. [11] Takahashi S, Suzuki A, Toyoda H, Terai H, Dohzono S, Yamada K, Matsumoto T, Yasuda H, Tsukiyama K, Shinohara Y, Ibrahim M, Nakamura H. Characteristics of diabetes associated with poor improvements in clinical outcomes after lumbar spine surgery. Spine 2013;38(6):516-22.

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy