Skip to main content
  • Comparative Study of Image-guided Versus Standard Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement with Emphasis on Technical and Clinical Outcome

    Final Number:
    781

    Authors:
    Parviz Dolati MD; Daniel Eichberg BA; Alexandra J. Golby MD

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2015 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Despite the large number of shunts placed, shunt-related complication and ventricular catheter revision rates remain high (30-40%). Satisfactory ventricular catheter positioning based only on anatomical landmarks and surgical experience is frequently challenging. This retrospective study was conducted to determine whether navigated-shunt placement improves technical and clinical outcomes compared with standard blind shunt placement.

    Methods: Forty-two standard shunts (SS) and forty-eight BrainLab neuronavigation system image-guided shunts (IGS) were placed in an adult population. Procedure duration, number of passes required for cannulation, intra- and post-operative complications, CT-determined ventricular catheter location, symptom improvement, and shunt revision rates were recorded. Continuous measures (duration) were compared with independent sample t-test, while all other outcome parameters were compared using Pearson’s Chi-Square method.

    Results: Mean induction to incision time was significantly higher in IGS than SS group (64.6±4.9 min versus 52.0± 7.2 min, p=0.0051). Mean incision to closure time and entire procedure time from induction were not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.507 and 0.103, respectively). The catheter tip was optimally positioned in 79% of IGS compared with 57% of SS (p=0.024). The number of passes was not significantly different between both groups (p=0.71). Complication rate was significantly lower in the IGS group (10.42% versus 28.57%, p= 0.028), reducing revision rate from 31.0% in SS to 10.4% in IGS group (p=0.015). One IGS case and 3 SS cases were complicated by early shunt infection. No Mayfield-related complications were noted.

    Conclusions: IGS surgery improves shunt placement and complication rate significantly, decreasing shunt revision rate.

    Patient Care: By showing everybody how to do image-guided shunt placement, they can improve the quality of VP shunt placement and so, decrease the rate of complications.

    Learning Objectives: To learn how image guidance may improve the quality of care and success rate of shunt placement and therefore decrease the rate of complications.

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy