In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings in Operatively and Non-Operatively Managed Unilateral Cervical Facet Fractures

    Final Number:
    741

    Authors:
    Daniel D. Kim BS; Kristin Nosova BA, MBA; Ryan Gregory Nazar MD; Maxwell Boakye MD

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2015 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Studies show cervical facet fracture instability is related to certain Computed tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings. This retrospective descriptive study of patients with unilateral cervical facet fractures (UCFF) further examines CT and MRI findings associated with surgical and non-surgical management of such injury.

    Methods: Demographic, clinical, and CT/MRI imaging data of patients with UCFF managed at University of Louisville Hospital, a level-1-trauma center, from 2011-2014 were collected and analyzed.

    Results: UCFF from 212 patients were analyzed. 72% were male, 85% were white, average age was 42 years. Primary mechanism of injury was motor vehicle accident (76%). A majority of patients were GCS>13 (92%). 62 patients (33%) underwent instrumented fusion. Vertebral artery injury was present in 20 patients (11%). The most common injury level was C6-C7 (41%) and fracture height was greatest at C2-C3. Surgery was more frequently performed in patients with ligamentous injury: ligamentum flavum, posterior longitudinal ligament, and anterior longitudinal ligament (35.5%, 51.6%, 48.4%, respectively, p<0.05). Disc injury (29%) and herniated discs (20%) also associated more with surgical vs conservative management (75% vs 67%, respectively, p<0.05). Most common level to have surgery was C4-C5 (41%). SLIC<4 (62%) less commonly received surgical intervention (20%; p<0.05). SLIC=5 (27%) associated with a higher percentage of surgical intervention (91%, p< 0.05).

    Conclusions: This study, one of the largest reported on UCFF studies, reports the level most commonly injured (C6-C7), and levels most associated with fracture height >1cm (C2-C3) and surgery (C4-C5), and quantifies significant rate of vertebral artery injury associated with these fractures. In agreement with previous literature, SLIC=5 predicted greater use of surgery with the majority managed surgically. The rate of floating fractures involving pedicle, facet, and lamina was quantified where the majority was managed conservatively. Future studies will be performed to compare outcomes between operated and non-operated floating fractures.

    Patient Care: This study has potential to improve future patient care by providing reinforcing data of previous studies on certain characteristics and imaging findings associated with unilateral facet fractures to prompt further investigation and possible development of an algorithmic approach to unilateral cervical facet fractures.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to discuss injury characteristics associated with unilateral cervical facet fractures and discuss CT and MRI findings or injury characteristics associated with surgically managed patients

    References: 1. Spector, Leo R, et al. "Use of computed tomography to predict failure of nonoperative treatment of unilateral facet fractures of the cervical spine." Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) 31.24 (2006):2827-35. 2. Vaccaro, A R, et al. "Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of soft tissue disruption after flexion-distraction injuries of the subaxial cervical spine." Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) 26.17 (2001):1866-72. 3. Halliday, A L, et al. "The management of unilateral lateral mass/facet fractures of the subaxial cervical spine: the use of magnetic resonance imaging to predict instability." Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) 22.22 (1997):2614-21. 4. Grauer, Jonathan N, et al. "The timing and influence of MRI on the management of patients with cervical facet dislocations remains highly variable: a survey of members of the Spine Trauma Study Group." Journal of spinal disorders & techniques 22.2 (2009):96-9. 5. Pizones, J., et al. (2012). "Sequential damage assessment of the different components of the posterior ligamentous complex after magnetic resonance imaging interpretation: prospective study 74 traumatic fractures." Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(11): E662-667. 6. Aarabi, Bizhan, et al. "Comparative effectiveness of surgical versus nonoperative management of unilateral, nondisplaced, subaxial cervical spine facet fractures without evidence of spinal cord injury: clinical article." Journal of neurosurgery. Spine 20.3 (2014):270-7. 7. Joaquim, Andrei F, Alpesh APatel, and Alexander RVaccaro. "Cervical injuries scored according to the Subaxial Injury Classification system: An analysis of the literature." Journal of craniovertebral junction and spine 5.2 (2014):65-70.

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy