Skip to main content
  • Comparative Analysis of Laminotomy and Microdiscectomy with Revisions

    Final Number:

    Parth Kothari BS; Javier Z Guzman BS; Samuel K Cho MD; Nathan John Lee BS; John I Shin BS; Jeremy Steinberger MD; Branko Skovrlj MD; Dante Leven DO

    Study Design:

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2015 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Discectomy is one of the most common spine procedure performed and has been supported by several long-term studies. Relatively low complication rates are reported, though reoperation rates are as high as 30%. Standard discectomy (SD) is the most frequently performed procedure for lumbar herniated nucleus propulsos (HNP), though few studies have compared primary SD and revision SD with regard to post-operative complications using a large database.

    Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the NSQIP database. Patients > 18 years old undergoing SD or revision SD between 2005 and 2012 were included. Patient baseline factors, perioperative data, preoperative labs, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores and post-operative events were recorded. Patients in the two cohorts were compared using multivariate logistic regression analysis with significance defined as p < 0.05. Odds ratio (OR) was calculated with a 95% confidence interval.

    Results: During the study period 4703 patients underwent SD and 649 underwent revision SD. Mean age for SD was 51.7 years old (15.84) and revision 50.1 years old (14.3). Patients undergoing revision were more likely to be male (59.8% vs 40.2%, p <0.004) and less likely to have ASA score of >/= to 3 (36.0% vs 29.0%, p=0.01). Patient comorbidities were similar between the two cohorts except lower rate of cardiac complications in the revision SD (48.8% vs 40.2%, p=0.002, all others p>0.05). Comparison of all complications, reoperations, mortality, readmission, length of stay (LOS) and graft failure were similar between the two cohorts (all p>0.05)

    Conclusions: Patients undergoing revision SD were more commonly male and with lower ASA scores and less cardiac comorbidity while other patient comorbidities, post-operative complications and operative factors were similar between the two groups. This may reflect a trend towards less surgical intervention in patients with extensive medical problems as supported by other recent studies.

    Patient Care: Better understanding differences in outcomes between standard and revision discectomy will help surgeons understand the benefits and risks of a revision.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to understand the comparison in outcomes between standard and revision discectomy.


We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy