In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Clinical and Radiographic Parameters Associated with Best vs. Worst Clinical Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Deformity Surgery

    Final Number:
    1289

    Authors:
    Kai-Ming Fu; Gregory Mundis; Khoi Duc Than; Paul Park; Stacie Nguyen; Michael Wang; Dean Chou; Pearce Nunley; Neel Anand; Richard Fessler; Christopher Shaffrey; Shay Bess; Behrooz A. Akbarnia; Vedat Deviren; Juan S. Uribe; Adam S. Kanter; David O. Okonkwo; Praveen V. Mummaneni

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2015 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: MIS deformity techniques have limited ability to restore sagittal balance and match the PI-LL. However, MIS techniques are effective for decompression and limit tissue disruption. We sought to compare best vs. worst outcomes after MIS surgery to identify variables that predispose to postoperative success.

    Methods: We did a retrospective review of circumferential MIS (cMIS) deformity surgery cases and compared parameters in the 20% of patients who had the greatest improvement in ODI vs. the 20% of patients who had the least improvement in ODI at two years follow up.

    Results: 104 patients underwent cMIS fusion surgery; the top 20% in terms of ODI improvement at 2 years (Best) were compared with the worst 20% (Worst). There was no statistically significant difference in age, BMI, pre- and postop Cobb angle, PT, PI, levels fused, O.R. time, and blood loss between the Best and Worst Groups. However, the preop ODI was significantly worse at baseline in the group that had the greatest change in ODI. There was no difference in preop PI-LL mismatch (12.8° Best vs. 19.5° Worst, p=0.298). Compared to patients who did poorly, patients who did well after MIS fusion had lower postop SVA (3.4 cm Best vs. 6.9 cm Worst, p=0.043) and had matched PI-LL (10° Best vs. 19° Worst, p=0.027). The Best Group also had better postop VAS back and leg pain scores (p<0.05).

    Conclusions: MIS deformity surgeons should focus on correcting a patient’s PI-LL mismatch to within 10° and restoring SVA < 5cm. Restoration of these parameters seems to impact which patients will achieve the greatest degree of improvement in ODI outcomes, while patients who do worst are not appropriately corrected (fused into a fixed deformity).

    Patient Care: This study helps spine surgeons identify which patients are likely to benefit most from MIS deformity surgery.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1) Describe the importance of spinopelvic parameters in deformity surgery, 2) Discuss, in small groups, the factors important in patient outcomes after deformity surgery, and 3) Identify which patients are good candidates for MIS deformity surgery.

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy