Skip to main content
  • Heterotopic Ossification after Single-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Historically-controlled Trial Comparing Allograft to an Optimized Dose of rh

    Final Number:
    1255

    Authors:
    Paul M. Arnold MD; Karen K. Anderson BS; Abdulhafez Selim MD, PhD, MBA; Kevin T. Foley MD, FACS, FAANS; Randall Dryer; John Kenneth Burkus

    Study Design:
    Clinical Trial

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2015 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Heterotopic ossification (HO) has been reported following hip, knee, cervical, and lumbar arthroplasties and posterolateral lumbar fusion with rhBMP-2. Data regarding HO following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with rhBMP-2 is sparse. We evaluated grades and/or locations of HO and effects of HO on safety and efficacy in rhBMP-2 and allograft groups.

    Methods: This was a sub-analysis of the prospective multicenter investigational device exemption trial comparing patients with symptomatic single-level cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) who underwent ACDF with rhBMP-2 on an absorbable collagen sponge (rhBMP-2/ACS) or cortical allograft. Clinical outcomes were compared to previous disc replacement studies. Rate, location, grade, and size of HO were assessed preoperatively and at 24 months. Outcomes were radiographs (neutral AP/lateral; dynamic flexion-extension/lateral); Neck Disability Index (NDI); arm/neck pain scores; SF-36 PCS; gait assessment; Park classification; fusion success; and adverse events.

    Results: At 24 months, the rate of any HO was significantly higher in rhBMP-2/ACS patients after adjusting for preoperative HO and by propensity score. In both groups, HO was primarily anterior; in the rhBMP-2/ACS group, no posterior HO was observed. Park Grade 3 HO at superior adjacent-level disc spaces significantly reduced ROM in both groups, more in the rhBMP-2/ACS group. At 24 months, anterior HO negatively affected NDI success (excluding neck/arm pain scores), neurological status, and overall success in rhBMP-2/ACS patients but not in allograft patients. No significant relationship was observed between HO and adverse events or additional surgeries in either group.

    Conclusions: Implantation of rhBMP-2/ACS at 1.5 mg/mL with PEEK spacer and titanium plate is effective in inducing fusion and improving pain and function in patients undergoing ACDF for symptomatic single-level cervical DDD. HO rates were significantly higher in rhBMP-2/ACS patients compared to allograft patients, but fusion rates, NDI success, and neurological status were statistically superior in rhBMP-2/ACS patients.

    Patient Care: Our research adds to the body of literature showing that implantation of rhBMP-2/ACS at 1.5 mg/mL with PEEK spacer and titanium plate is effective in inducing fusion and improving pain and function in patients undergoing ACDF for symptomatic single-level cervical DDD.

    Learning Objectives: Identify the relationship between HO and adverse events in either treatment group. Although HO rates were higher in rhBMP-2/ACS patients, describe why rhBMP-2/ACS is still considered safe and effective in inducing fusion and improving pain and function.

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy