Skip to main content
  • Approaching the Curve Convexity or Concavity with Minimally Invasive Lateral Transpsoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Adult Patients with Thoracolumbar Degenerative Scoliosis: An Analysis of Complication

    Final Number:
    1214

    Authors:
    Justin K Scheer BS; Ryan Khanna BS; Alejandro Lopez; Richard G. Fessler MD; Tyler R. Koski MD; Zachary A Smith MD; Nader S. Dahdaleh MD

    Study Design:
    Clinical Trial

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2015 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: The minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach for correction of adult degenerative scoliosis has been shown to be effective and safe. However, it has yet to be determined if correction from either side of the curve apex results in a reduction in complications and/or offers improved corrective ability. The purpose was to compare the approach related neurological complications and magnitude of correction in patients undergoing direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF) for degenerative thoracolumbar scoliosis based on a convex versus a concave approach.

    Methods: This is a single center retrospective chart review. Inclusion criteria: patients that underwent a DLIF for adult degenerative thoracolumbar scoliosis and had the DLIF prior to any other supplemental procedures. Patients were grouped based on the DLIF approach toward the curve apex concavity (CAVE) or toward the curve apex convexity (VEX). Standard regional and segmental coronal radiographic measurements were made as well as regional sagittal spino-pelvic parameters. Neurological complications and reoperation indications were also recorded.

    Results: A total of 32 patients were included (CAVE: 17, VEX: 15) with a mean age of 65.5±10.2yrs and mean follow-up of 17.0±15.7 months. Overall, there were 8 total post-operative neurological complications for 8 (25.0%) patients and 7 reoperations for 6 (18.8%) patients (CAVE: 4/17 [23.5%] and VEX: 2/15 [13.3%]). CAVE had 6/17 neurological complications (35.3%, 4 ipsilateral and 2 contralateral to the approach side) and VEX had 2/15 (13.3%, 1 ipsilateral and 1 bilateral to the approach side, p>0.05). All patients significantly improved in all mean regional and segmental Cobb angles (p<0.05) except for T11-T12 (p>0.05). There were no significant differences between CAVE and VEX for any of the radiographic parameters measured (p>0.05).

    Conclusions: Approaching the curve apex from either the concave or convex resulted in significant improvement in correction. The concave approach was associated with more post-operative neurological complications.

    Patient Care: The results of this study can set the groundwork for future larger studies and provide surgeons evidence to approach the scoliosis curve from the convex side in order to potentially reduce neurological complications.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1) understand that there is no standard approach side to degenerative scoliosis using a DLIF approach, 2) appreciate that either approach may result in similar corrective ability, and 3) acknowledge that there may be a higher incidence of neurological complications using a concave approach.

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy