Skip to main content
  • Provider Volume and Short-Term Outcomes following Surgery for Spinal Metastases

    Final Number:
    1209

    Authors:
    Mohamad Bydon MD; Rafael De la Garza-Ramos MD; Nicholas B. Abt BS; Daniel M. Sciubba BS, MD; Jean-Paul Wolinsky MD; Timothy F. Witham BS MD; Ziya L. Gokaslan MD; Ali Bydon MD

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2015 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: The objective of this study is to analyze the impact of surgeon and hospital volume on short-term outcomes following surgery for spinal metastases.

    Methods: Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2003 – 2009) were extracted. Patients who underwent surgery for metastatic spinal tumors were identified via ICD-9 codes. Surgeon and hospital volume were evaluated as a continuous variable. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to calculate the adjusted odds ratios of in-hospital mortality, post-operative complication development, non-routine discharges, prolonged length of stay, and high hospital charges.

    Results: A total of 3,069 admissions were examined. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 4.4% and in-hospital complication rate 29.7%; non-routine discharges occurred in 63.3% of patients. Increasing provider volume was not associated with lower odds of in-hospital mortality. On the other hand, increasing surgeon volume was associated with significantly lower odds of developing an in-hospital complication (OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.58 – 0.85) and having a non-routine discharge (OR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66 – 0.87). Increasing hospital volume was not associated with lower odds of developing a postoperative complication, but was associated with lower odds of having a non-routine discharge (OR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73 – 0.95). Patients operated on by higher volume surgeons were less likely to have a prolonged length of stay (over 14 days); higher hospital volume was associated with increased odds of high hospital charges (over $135,571 USD).

    Conclusions: In this study utilizing the NIS, patients with metastatic spinal tumors treated by higher volume surgeons had significantly lower complication rates, were more likely to be discharged home following surgery, and were less likely to have prolonged length of stay. Increasing hospital volume was associated with lower non-routine discharge rates, but with higher hospital charges. Better outcomes with higher volume surgeons may be a reflection of patient selection.

    Patient Care: Provide clinicians with evidence regarding the influence of provider volume on short-term outcomes following surgery for spinal metastases

    Learning Objectives: 1. Know the effect of provider volume on short-term outcomes following surgery for spinal metastases

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy