In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Intraoperative O-arm® Imaging Versus Stimulus-evoked Electromyography (EMG) for Evaluation of Pedicle Screw Breaches: A Prospective Study of 1006 Screws in 164 Cases

    Final Number:
    662

    Authors:
    Ricky Raj Singh Kalra MD; Andrew T. Dailey

    Study Design:
    Clinical Trial

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2015 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Historically, intraoperative EMG has been utilized to detect pedicle screw breaches. The use of intraoperative O-arm imaging to assess pedicle fixation has replaced EMG assessment for screw breaches at our institution. There have been no reports on the reliability of EMG when compared with intraoperative imaging.

    Methods: A total of 1006 lumbar screws were placed in 164 consecutive cases. Prospective data was obtained by stimulating all screws and then evaluating them with intraoperative O-arm imaging. EMG data was compared with O-arm images to assess pedicle breaches, and all breaches were corrected at the time of initial surgery by palpating the entire trajectory and directly visualizing the pedicle in cases of medial breach.

    Results: There were 35 breaches (20 lateral, 15 medial) visualized during surgery with O-arm imaging; 3.5% of all lumbar screws placed. Of the breaches, 14 screws stimulated below the 12-mA threshold; 9 screws stimulated between 12-20 mA; and 12 breached screws did not generate an EMG response. 40 screws stimulated below a 12-mA threshold but showed no breach on imaging. Using the 12-mA threshold for our analysis, the sensitivity of EMG was 40%, specificity 96%, and a PPV of 26% (95% CI: 15 - 40%). All 35 breached screws were corrected during surgery. There were no false-positives in the O-arm group as assessed by direct visualization and palpation of the trajectory. There were no postoperative symptoms caused by breached screws and no patients required re-operation.

    Conclusions: Our data confirm that the EMG modality for testing screw breaches is unreliable. In the modern era of intraoperative imaging, lumbar screws should be evaluated for breaches with O-arm rather than relying on EMG stimulation if there are doubts about the position. Direct visualization of the pedicle and palpation of the entire trajectory confirm that O-arm is highly accurate in assessing pedicle breaches.

    Patient Care: Our research will improve quality outcome measures by reducing post-operative radicular symptoms caused by breached screws and re-operation for correction of screws.

    Learning Objectives: Pedicle Fixation Intra-operative imaging EMG Testing

    References: Wang, et al. Stimulus-evoked electromyography testing of percutaneous pedicle screws for the detection of pedicle breaches: a clinical study of 409 screws in 93 patients. JNS Spine 2010. Glassman, et al. A prospective analysis of intraoperative electromyographic monitoring of pedicle screw placement with computed tomographic scan confirmation. Spine. 1995

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy