Skip to main content
  • Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunting in Pediatric Posterior Fossa Tumors

    Final Number:

    Kyle Anthony Smith MD; Kushal Shah MD; Sheela Vivekanandan MD; Gregory W. Hornig MD

    Study Design:

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2015 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Central nervous system (CNS) tumors comprise the most common solid neoplasms in children. The majority of these tumors are found in the posterior fossa. Many develop obstructive hydrocephalus given the tumor’s close proximity to the fourth ventricle and require ventricular shunt placement. In an attempt to evaluate the need for permanent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion after craniotomy, a series of pediatric patients was identified.

    Methods: Twenty-one patients were evaluated retrospectively for shunt placement within three months following surgical removal of their posterior fossa tumors. Several factors were evaluated including hydrocephalus at presentation using Evan’s index, age at diagnosis, gender, location of the tumor (midline versus cerebellar hemispheres), tumor pathology, and duration of presenting symptoms.

    Results: Using the Fisher Exact test, the presence of hydrocephalus upon presentation using the Evan’s index was found to be statistically significant when correlated with shunt placement within 3 months of tumor resection (p = 0.03).

    Conclusions: Hydrocephalus on admission was a statistically significant predictor of need for ventricular shunting following posterior fossa tumor resection. Other variables such as age and malignancy of tumor were not statistically significant, yet other authors suggest these may be risk factors for close observation. Information about the likelihood of shunt placement can be helpful for the neurosurgeon as well as the family members to prepare for the clinical outcome, which may include placement of a permanent ventriculoperitoneal shunt.

    Patient Care: The purpose of this publication is to educate patients’ families early about the likelihood for the need of a permanent shunt. At the time of initial discussion, talking about tumor treatment and possible need for shunt placement is helpful to parents for setting expectations of the care of their child. Frequently, the discussion for needing a shunt comes weeks after tumor resection and is viewed negatively or as a failure. However, with proper counseling and discussion, placement of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt is not seen as an adverse outcome, rather part of an expected course.

    Learning Objectives: 1) Attendees will be introduced to the social issues surrounding the concept of post-operative shunting and need for pre-operative counseling. 2) Attendees will be familiarized to the variables associated with need for CSF shunting in our population of pediatric posterior fossa tumors.

    References: 1. Albright AL. The value of precraniotomy shunts in children with posterior fossa tumors. Clinical neurosurgery. 1983;30:278-285. 2. Becker LE, Halliday WC. Central nervous system tumors of childhood. Perspectives in pediatric pathology. 1987;10:86-134. 3. Chumas P, Sainte-Rose C, Cinalli G, Renier D, Zerah M. III Ventriculostomy in the management of posterior fossa tumors in children. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the ISPN congress, Santiago, Chile1995. 4. Culley DJ, Berger MS, Shaw D, Geyer R. An analysis of factors determining the need for ventriculoperitoneal shunts after posterior fossa tumor surgery in children. Neurosurgery. Mar 1994;34(3):402-407; discussion 407-408. 5. Davis CH, Odom GL, Woodhall B. Brain tumors in children; clinical analysis of 164 cases. Pediatrics. Dec 1956;18(6):856-870. 6. Dias MS, Albright AL. Management of hydrocephalus complicating childhood posterior fossa tumors. Pediatric neuroscience. 1989;15(6):283-289; discussion 290. 7. El-Gaidi MA, El-Nasr AH, Eissa EM. Infratentorial complications following preresection CSF diversion in children with posterior fossa tumors. Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics. Jan 2015;15(1):4-11. 8. Epstein F, Murali R. Pediatric posterior fossa tumors: hazards of the "preoperative" shunt. Neurosurgery. Nov-Dec 1978;3(3):348-350. 9. Farwell JR, Dohrmann GJ, Flannery JT. Central nervous system tumors in children. Cancer. Dec 1977;40(6):3123-3132. 10. Fritsch MJ, Doerner L, Kienke S, Mehdorn HM. Hydrocephalus in children with posterior fossa tumors: role of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Journal of neurosurgery. Jul 2005;103(1 Suppl):40-42. 11. Gopalakrishnan CV, Dhakoji A, Menon G, Nair S. Factors predicting the need for cerebrospinal fluid diversion following posterior fossa tumor surgery in children. Pediatric neurosurgery. 2012;48(2):93-101. 12. Kumar V, Phipps K, Harkness W, Hayward RD. Ventriculo-peritoneal shunt requirement in children with posterior fossa tumours: an 11-year audit. British journal of neurosurgery. Oct 1996;10(5):467-470. 13. Lee M, Wisoff JH, Abbott R, Freed D, Epstein FJ. Management of hydrocephalus in children with medulloblastoma: prognostic factors for shunting. Pediatric neurosurgery. 1994;20(4):240-247. 14. Matsumoto J, Kochi M, Morioka M, et al. A long-term ventricular drainage for patients with germ cell tumors or medulloblastoma. Surgical neurology. Jan 2006;65(1):74-80; discussion 80. 15. Morelli D, Pirotte B, Lubansu A, et al. Persistent hydrocephalus after early surgical management of posterior fossa tumors in children: is routine preoperative endoscopic third ventriculostomy justified? Journal of neurosurgery. Sep 2005;103(3 Suppl):247-252. 16. Papo I, Caruselli G, Luongo A. External ventricular drainage in the management of posterior fossa tumors in children and adolescents. Neurosurgery. Jan 1982;10(1):13-15. 17. Pearson D, Steward JK. Malignant disease in juveniles. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine. Jul 7 1969;62(7):685-688. 18. Raimondi AJ, Tomita T. Hydrocephalus and infratentorial tumors. Incidence, clinical picture, and treatment. Journal of neurosurgery. Aug 1981;55(2):174-182. 19. Riva-Cambrin J, Detsky AS, Lamberti-Pasculli M, et al. Predicting postresection hydrocephalus in pediatric patients with posterior fossa tumors. Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics. May 2009;3(5):378-385. 20. Ruggiero C, Cinalli G, Spennato P, et al. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the treatment of hydrocephalus in posterior fossa tumors in children. Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery. Nov 2004;20(11-12):828-833. 21. Sainte-Rose C, Cinalli G, Roux FE, et al. Management of hydrocephalus in pediatric patients with posterior fossa tumors: the role of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Journal of neurosurgery. Nov 2001;95(5):791-797. 22. Santos de Oliveira R, Barros Juca CE, Valera ET, Machado HR. Hydrocephalus in posterior fossa tumors in children. Are there factors that determine a need for permanent cerebrospinal fluid diversion? Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery. Dec 2008;24(12):1397-1403. 23. Schmid UD, Seiler RW. Management of obstructive hydrocephalus secondary to posterior fossa tumors by steroids and subcutaneous ventricular catheter reservoir. Journal of neurosurgery. Nov 1986;65(5):649-653. 24. Stein BM, Tenner MS, Fraser RA. Hydrocephalus following removal of cerebellar astrocytomas in children. Journal of neurosurgery. Jun 1972;36(6):763-768. 25. Waga S, Shimizu T, Shimosaka S, Tochio H. Intratumoral hemorrhage after a ventriculoperitoneal shunting procedure. Neurosurgery. Sep 1981;9(3):249-252. 26. Young JL, Jr., Miller RW. Incidence of malignant tumors in U. S. children. The Journal of pediatrics. Feb 1975;86(2):254-258. 27. Zuccarello M, Dollo C, Carollo C. Spontaneous intratumoral hemorrhage after ventriculoperitoneal shunting. Neurosurgery. Feb 1985;16(2):245-246.

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy