In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Rotterdam Computed Tomography Score and Outcomes of Decompressive Craniectomy

    Final Number:
    726

    Authors:
    Muhammad Waqas MBBS; Muhammad Shamim; Faaiz Enam; Mohsin Qadeer MD; Saqib Bakhshi; Iqra Patoli

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2014 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Data on the evaluation of The Rotterdam Computed Tomography Score (RCTS) as a predictor of outcomes in patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy (DC) for trauma is limited and lacks clarity. The objective of the study was to explore the role of RCTS in predicting unfavorable outcomes, including mortality in patients undergoing DC for head trauma.

    Methods: This was an observational cohort study conducted from January I, 2009 to March 31, 2013. CT scans of adults with head trauma prior to emergency DC were scored according to RCTS. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to identify the optimal cutoff RCTS for predicting unfavorable outcomes [Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) =1-3]. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between RCTS and unfavorable outcomes including mortality.

    Results: 197 patients (mean age: 31.4 ± 18.7 years) were included in the study. Mean GCS at presentation was 8.1 ± 3.6. RCTS was negatively correlated with GOS (r = -0.370, p < 0.001). The area under the curve was 0.687 (95 % CI 0.595- 0.779, p < 0.001,) and 0.666 (and 95 % CI 0.589 – 0.742; p < 0.001) for mortality and unfavorable outcomes, respectively. RCTS independently predicted both mortality (adjusted odds ratio for RCTS >3 compared with RCTS = 3: 2.792, 95% CI 1.235-6.311) and other unfavorable outcomes (adjusted odds ratio for RCTS >3 compared with RCTS = 3: 2.063, 95% CI 1.056-4.031).

    Conclusions: RCTS is an independent predictor of unfavorable outcomes and mortality among patients undergoing emergency DC.

    Patient Care: It will help in counselling the families about severity and prognosis of head injuries.

    Learning Objectives: To determine the predictive value of CT scoring systems for traumatic brain injury patients. To compare the various classification systems for their predictor of outcomes in patient undergoing decompressive craniectomy.

    References: 1. Aarabi B, Hesdorffer DC, Ahn ES, Aresco C, Scalea TM, Eisenberg HM (2006) Outcome following decompressive craniectomy for malignant swelling due to severe head injury. Journal of neurosurgery 104:469-479 2. Aarabi B, Hesdorffer DC, Simard JM, Ahn ES, Aresco C, Eisenberg HM, McCunn M, Scalea T (2009) Comparative study of decompressive craniectomy after mass lesion evacuation in severe head injury. Neurosurgery 64:927-939; discussion 939-940 3. Balestreri M, Czosnyka M, Hutchinson P, Steiner LA, Hiler M, Smielewski P, Pickard JD (2006) Impact of intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure on severe disability and mortality after head injury. Neurocritical care 4:8-13 4. Bloomfield GL, Ridings PC, Blocher CR, Marmarou A, Sugerman HJ (1996) Effects of increased intra-abdominal pressure upon intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressure before and after volume expansion. The Journal of trauma 40:936-941; discussion 941-933 5. Chesnut RM, Temkin N, Carney N, Dikmen S, Rondina C, Videtta W, Petroni G, Lujan S, Pridgeon J, Barber J (2012) A trial of intracranial-pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury. New England Journal of Medicine 367:2471-2481 6. Chun KA, Manley GT, Stiver SI, Aiken AH, Phan N, Wang V, Meeker M, Cheng S-C, Gean A, Wintermark M (2010) Interobserver variability in the assessment of CT imaging features of traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurotrauma 27:325-330 7. Collaborators MCT, Perel P, Arango M, Clayton T, Edwards P, Komolafe E, Poccock S, Roberts I, Shakur H, Steyerberg E (2008) Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients. bmj 336:425-429 8. Cooper DJ, Rosenfeld JV, Murray L, Wolfe R, Ponsford J, Davies A, D'Urso P, Pellegrino V, Malham G, Kossmann T (2008) Early decompressive craniectomy for patients with severe traumatic brain injury and refractory intracranial hypertension--a pilot randomized trial. Journal of critical care 23:387-393 9. Howard JL, Cipolle MD, Anderson M, Sabella V, Shollenberger D, Li PM, Pasquale MD (2008) Outcome after decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 65:380-386 10. Huang Y-H, Deng Y-H, Lee T-C, Chen W-F (2012) Rotterdam Computed Tomography Score as a Prognosticator in Head-Injured Patients Undergoing Decompressive Craniectomy. Neurosurgery 71:80-85 11. Hutchinson PJ, Corteen E, Czosnyka M, Mendelow AD, Menon DK, Mitchell P, Murray G, Pickard JD, Rickels E, Sahuquillo J, Servadei F, Teasdale GM, Timofeev I, Unterberg A, Kirkpatrick PJ (2006) Decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury: the randomized multicenter RESCUEicp study (www.RESCUEicp.com). Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement 96:17-20 12. Hyder AA, Wunderlich CA, Puvanachandra P, Gururaj G, Kobusingye OC (2007) The impact of traumatic brain injuries: a global perspective. NeuroRehabilitation 22:341-353 13. Jiang J-Y, Xu W, Li W-P, Xu W-H, Zhang J, Bao Y-H, Ying Y-H, Luo Q-Z (2005) Efficacy of standard trauma craniectomy for refractory intracranial hypertension with severe traumatic brain injury: a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study. Journal of neurotrauma 22:623-628 14. Lobato RD, Gomez PA, Alday R, Rivas JJ, Dominguez J, Cabrera A, Turanzas FS, Benitez A, Rivero B (1997) Sequential computerized tomography changes and related final outcome in severe head injury patients. Acta neurochirurgica 139:385-391 15. Maas AI, Hukkelhoven CW, Marshall LF, Steyerberg EW (2005) Prediction of outcome in traumatic brain injury with computed tomographic characteristics: a comparison between the computed tomographic classification and combinations of computed tomographic predictors. Neurosurgery 57:1173-1182 16. Marshall LF, Marshall SB, Klauber MR, Clark MvB, Eisenberg HM, Jane JA, Luerssen TG, Marmarou A, Foulkes MA (1991) A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography. Special Supplements 75:S14-S20 17. McGarry LJ, Thompson D, Millham FH, Cowell L, Snyder PJ, Lenderking WR, Weinstein MC (2002) Outcomes and costs of acute treatment of traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 53:1152-1159 18. Perel P, Edwards P, Wentz R, Roberts I (2006) Systematic review of prognostic models in traumatic brain injury. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 6:38 19. Polin RS, Shaffrey ME, Bogaev CA, Tisdale N, Germanson T, Bocchicchio B, Jane JA (1997) Decompressive bifrontal craniectomy in the treatment of severe refractory posttraumatic cerebral edema. Neurosurgery 41:84-94 20. Razzak JA, Shamim MS, Mehmood A, Hussain SA, Ali MS, Jooma R (2012) A successful model of road traffic injury surveillance in a developing country: process and lessons learnt. BMC public health 12:357 21. Saul TG, Ducker TB (1982) Intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with severe head injury. The American surgeon 48:477-480 22. Servadei F, Nasi MT, Giuliani G, Cremonini AM, Cenni P, Zappi D, Taylor GS (2000) CT prognostic factors in acute subdural haematomas: the value of the 'worst' CT scan. British journal of neurosurgery 14:110-116 23. Shamim MS, Ali SF, Enam SA (2011) Non-operative management is superior to surgical stabilization in spine injury patients with complete neurological deficits: A perspective study from a developing world country, Pakistan. Surgical neurology international 2 24. Shamim MS, Khan UR, Razzak JA, Rasheed J (2011) Injuries due to fall make summer time power outages a potential public health issue. Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock 4:147 25. Shamim S, Razzak JA, Jooma R, Khan U (2011) Initial results of Pakistan's first road traffic injury surveillance project. International journal of injury control and safety promotion 18:213-217 26. Sobani ZA, Shamim MS, Zafar SN, Qadeer M, Bilal N, Murtaza SG, Enam SA, Bari ME (2011) Cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: An institutional audit and analysis of factors related to complications. Surgical neurology international 2 27. Taylor A, Butt W, Rosenfeld J, Shann F, Ditchfield M, Lewis E, Klug G, Wallace D, Henning R, Tibballs J (2001) A randomized trial of very early decompressive craniectomy in children with traumatic brain injury and sustained intracranial hypertension. Child's Nervous System 17:154-162 28. Timofeev I, Santarius T, Kolias AG, Hutchinson PJ (2012) Decompressive craniectomy - operative technique and perioperative care. Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery 38:115-136 29. Yuh EL, Cooper SR, Ferguson AR, Manley GT (2012) Quantitative CT improves outcome prediction in acute traumatic brain injury. Journal of neurotrauma 29:735-746

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy