In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Compare the therapeutic results of between the chemical and mechanical intra-arterial throbombolysis.

    Final Number:
    745

    Authors:
    Dosung Yoo MD PhD

    Study Design:
    Clinical Trial

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2014 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Intravenous administration of tissue plasminogen activator (iv-tPA) is accepted as a standard treatment for acute cerebral stroke, but the clinical outcomes cannot be warranted in patients who are not recanalized after iv-tPA or not indication for iv-tPA. Recently intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy (IA-Tx) reported good results. But, clinical outcomes was not compared who treated IA-Tx by chemical and mechanical methods. Authors analyze the IA-Tx sub-group end results.

    Methods: 154 patients were divided into a chemical thrombolysis group (n=92: Urokinase, Rheopro, etc) and mechanical thrombolysis group (n=62: Solitair, balloon, other devices). Mechanical thrombolysis groups were sub-divided according to weather used Solitair or not. And other clinical data sub-analyzed by tPA used or perfusion/diffusion mismatch (P/D-mismatching) or not. Treatment results were compared by recanalization rate, clinical outcomes, mortality, and significant intra-cerebral hemorrhage rate.

    Results: Recanalization rate was 58.% in chemical thrombolysis group and 79.0% in the mechanical thrombolysis group (?2, p<0.05). Favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scales score of 0–2), mortality and significant intra-cerebral hemorrhage were similar in the two groups(?2, p>0.05). And sub-group of mechanical thrombolysis group shows that recanalization rate was better in Solitair group but clinical outcomes shows no statistical difference (?2, p>0.05). Complications such as clinical significant intra-cerebral hemorrhage and cerebral edema happened more frequent in chemical group (?2, p>0.05). P/D-mismatching checked just before the IA-Tx, was constant significant prognostic indicator in our analysis (?2, p<0.05).

    Conclusions: In our study, mechanical thrombolysis group shows better recanalization rate and best in Solitair group compared with chemical thrombolysis group. But clinical outcomes show no difference in all treatment group. While P/D-mismatching was constant significant prognostic indicator in our analysis. So IA-x might be applied as additional treatment modality for patients with DWI/PWI mismatching.

    Patient Care: To improve the patients outcome, randomized control trial should be performed, which therapy, iv-tPA or IA-Tx is proper for large-artery intracranial occlusion patients. And dynamic images such as CT-angiograogy or MR-angiograohy should incluse as an initial evaluation image instead non-enhance CT.

    Learning Objectives: Although, mechanical thrombolysis is definitely improve the recanalization rate of major vessel occlusion. But end neurologic outcomes (mRS at 90 days after treatment) should be compared in a systemic approach. We need another therapeutic approach system, such as dynamic brain image to evaluated the vascular status and applied tailored therapeutic treatment method.

    References: J Neurointerv Surg. 2013 Sep 23. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010895. [Epub ahead of print] North American Solitaire Stent Retriever Acute Stroke registry: post-marketing revascularization and clinical outcome results. Stroke. 2013 Nov 21.Outcome of Standard and High-Risk Patients With Acute Anterior Circulation Stroke After Stent Retriever Thrombectomy. -- And lots of references.

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy