In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging in spinal gunshots wounds, an absolute contraindication?

    Final Number:
    1319

    Authors:
    Eduardo Martinez del Campo Oviedo MD; Leonardo Rangel-Castilla MD; Hector Enrique Soriano-Baron MD; Nicholas Theodore MD, FACS

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2014 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the setting of gunshot wounds at or near the lumbar spinal canal is controversial.

    Methods: A review of the English-language literature was performed. Data from 25 articles was analyzed, including 5 in vitro studies of the interaction between 95 projectiles and MR scanner magnetic fields and the clinical outcomes from 22 patients with metallic fragments at or near the spinal canal who underwent MR imaging.

    Results: Properties from 95 civilian and military projectiles were analyzed at an MR of 1.0, 1.5, 3.0 and 7.0 Tesla. The most common projectile core composition was lead (76.9%), either with a copper jacket or unjacketed. Steel containing (core or jacket) projectiles comprised 14.7%. No field interaction was evident in 96.3% (78 of 81) of nonsteel projectiles. All steel projectiles showed at least positive deflection forces, longitudinal migration, or rotation. Heating of the projectiles was clinically insignificant. Image artifact was significant in all 9 steel bullets tested, but was not significant in 88.6% (39 of 44) of nonsteel bullets tested. Overall, 22 patients with complete (82%) and incomplete (14%) spinal cord injury secondary to a projectile lodged inside the spinal canal underwent MR imaging. Discomfort and further physical or neurological deficits were not reported by any patient. Two patients with spinal cord injuries had MR imaging studies before surgical decompression and had subsequent, significant neurological improvement.

    Conclusions: Metallic implants near or at the spinal canal are a relative contraindication for MR imaging. However, safe MR imaging might be feasible when a projectile’s properties and individualized clinical presentation are ideal.

    Patient Care: The study provides evidence that might challenge the paradigm of MRI in patients with metallic foreign objects lodged near the spinal canal, specially in the setting of an acute gunshot wound.

    Learning Objectives: The authors reviewed the literature on the use of MR imaging in gunshot wounds to the spine. They discuss the results from in vitro and clinical studies, analyze the physical properties of common projectiles, and evaluate the safety and indications for MR imaging when metallic fragments are located near the spinal canal.

    References: 1. Bachschmidt T, Lipps F, Nittka M. syngo WARP - Metal artifact reduction techniques in magnetic resonance imaging. MAGNETOM Flash 2014;2:24-5 Ref ID: 25 2. Bashir EF, Cybulski GR, Chaudhri K, Choudhury AR. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the evaluation of penetrating gunshot injury of the spine. Case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976 ) 1993 May;18(6):772-3 Ref ID: 1 3. Benzel EC, Hadden TA, Coleman JE. Civilian gunshot wounds to the spinal cord and cauda equina. Neurosurgery 1987 February;20(2):281-5 Ref ID: 2 4. Bono CM, Heary RF. Gunshot wounds to the spine. Spine J 2004 March;4(2):230-40 Ref ID: 3 5. Dedini RD, Karacozoff AM, Shellock FG et al. MRI issues for ballistic objects: information obtained at 1.5-, 3- and 7-Tesla. Spine J 2013 July;13(7):815-22 Ref ID: 4 6. Ebraheim NA, Savolaine ER, Jackson WT, Andreshak TG, Rayport M. Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of a gunshot wound to the cervical spine. J Orthop Trauma 1989;3(1):19-22 Ref ID: 5 7. Eshed I, Kushnir T, Shabshin N, Konen E. Is magnetic resonance imaging safe for patients with retained metal fragments from combat and terrorist attacks? Acta Radiol 2010 March;51(2):170-4 Ref ID: 6 8. Finitsis SN, Falcone S, Green BA. MR of the spine in the presence of metallic bullet fragments: is the benefit worth the risk? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999 February;20(2):354-6 Ref ID: 7 9. Heary RF, Vaccaro AR, Mesa JJ, Balderston RA. Thoracolumbar infections in penetrating injuries to the spine. Orthop Clin North Am 1996 January;27(1):69-81 Ref ID: 8 10. Isiklar ZU, Lindsey RW. Gunshot wounds to the spine. Injury 1998;29 Suppl 1:SA7-12 Ref ID: 9 11. Karacozoff AM, Pekmezci M, Shellock FG. Armor-piercing bullet: 3-T MRI findings and identification by a ferromagnetic detection system. Mil Med 2013 March;178(3):e380-e385 Ref ID: 10 12. Kitchel SH. Current treatment of gunshot wounds to the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003 March;(408):115-9 Ref ID: 11 13. Kumar R, Lerski RA, Gandy S, Clift BA, Abboud RJ. Safety of orthopedic implants in magnetic resonance imaging: an experimental verification. J Orthop Res 2006 September;24(9):1799-802 Ref ID: 12 14. Moon E, Kondrashov D, Hannibal M, Hsu K, Zucherman J. Gunshot wounds to the spine: literature review and report on a migratory intrathecal bullet. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2008 March;37(3):E47-E51 Ref ID: 13 15. Oliver C, Kabala J. Air gun pellet injuries: the safety of MR imaging. Clin Radiol 1997 April;52(4):299-300 Ref ID: 14 16. Rentfrow B, Vaidya R, Elia C, Sethi A. Lead toxicity and management of gunshot wounds in the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 2013 November;22(11):2353-7 Ref ID: 15 17. Romanick PC, Smith TK, Kopaniky DR, Oldfield D. Infection about the spine associated with low-velocity-missile injury to the abdomen. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985 October;67(8):1195-201 Ref ID: 16 18. Shellock FG, Crues JV. High-field-strength MR imaging and metallic biomedical implants: an ex vivo evaluation of deflection forces. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988 August;151(2):389-92 Ref ID: 18 19. Shellock FG, Curtis JS. MR imaging and biomedical implants, materials, and devices: an updated review. Radiology 1991 August;180(2):541-50 Ref ID: 19 20. Shellock FG. Biomedical implants and devices: assessment of magnetic field interactions with a 3.0-Tesla MR system. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002 December;16(6):721-32 Ref ID: 17 21. Smith AS, Hurst GC, Duerk JL, Diaz PJ. MR of ballistic materials: imaging artifacts and potential hazards. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1991 May;12(3):567-72 Ref ID: 20 22. Smugar SS, Schweitzer ME, Hume E. MRI in patients with intraspinal bullets. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999 January;9(1):151-3 Ref ID: 21 23. Spakauskas B, Ambrozaitis KV, Kontautas E. The bullet in the dural sac. How to catch it? A report of two cases. Medicina (Kaunas ) 2007;43(6):478-81 Ref ID: 22 24. Teitelbaum GP, Yee CA, Van Horn DD, Kim HS, Colletti PM. Metallic ballistic fragments: MR imaging safety and artifacts. Radiology 1990 June;175(3):855-9 Ref ID: 23 25. Waters RL, Sie IH. Spinal cord injuries from gunshot wounds to the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003 March;(408):120-5 Ref ID: 24

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy