Skip to main content
  • Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Spinal Tumors via Corpectomy and Cage Reconstruction: Does the Mini-Open Approach Offer Benefits Over a Standard Open Approach?

    Final Number:

    Darryl Lau; Dean Chou M.D.

    Study Design:

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2014 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: There has been a shift of practice to utilize posterior-only approaches to performing thoracolumbar corpectomies for spinal metastasis. Most are still done through an open approach. This study compares outcomes of patients who undergo mini-open vs. traditional open transpedicular corpectomy for thoracic spinal metastasis.

    Methods: A consecutive cohort of adult patients from 2006 to 2013 who underwent transpedicular corpectomy in the thoracic spine for spinal metastasis was retrospectively identified. The mini-open transpedicular corpectomy was performed with a midline facial incision only over the level of corpectomy and percutaneous instrumentation 2 levels above and below. Bivariate statistics were employed to compare perioperative and follow-up outcomes between open and mini-open surgery.

    Results: 49 patients were included: 21 mini-open and 28 open . Mean age was 57.9 years, and 59.2% were male. The two groups were well matched. There were no significant difference in operative time between the open and mini-open groups (413.6 minutes vs. 452.4 minutes, p=0.329). Compared to the open group, the mini-open group had significantly less blood loss (1697.3 cc vs. 917.7 cc, p=0.019) and significantly shorter length of hospital stay (11.4 days vs. 7.4 days, p=0.001). There was a trend towards a lower perioperative complication rate in the mini-open group (9.5%) compared to the open group (21.4%), but this was not significant (p=0.265). At follow-up, there were no significant differences in ASIA score (p=0.342), complication rate after 30-days (p=0.999), and surgical revision rate (p=0.803). The open approach had a higher overall infection rate of 17.9% compared to the mini-open approach (9.5%), but this was not statistically significant (p=0.409).

    Conclusions: The mini-open transpedicular corpectomy is a safe and feasible procedure and offers less blood loss and shorter length of hospital stay. The mini-open corpectomy also trended towards lower infection rate and lower complication rate.

    Patient Care: This comparative study provides evidence that implementation of the mini-open approaches is less morbid. This is especially important in cancer patients. Future surgeons may consider mini-open approaches when treating their patients.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1. discuss the advantages to the mini-open approach when performing corpectomy for spinal metastasis 2. describe the importance of needing to lower morbidity and recover time with less invasive approaches to surgery for spinal metastasis


We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy