In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Endoscopic Management of Penetrating Skull Base Trauma: a case series

    Final Number:
    1311

    Authors:
    Robert Austin Miller BS MD; Eric Wang; Juan Carlos Fernandez-Miranda MD; Carl Snyderman MD; Paul A. Gardner MD

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2014 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Penetrating skull base trauma presents a unique set of challenges for surgical repair and management. These patients are at high risk for complications such as CSF leak, infection, and retained foreign body. Current management includes open cranial approaches to repair and reconstruct. Here, we present a case series of 4 patients with penetrating trauma to the skull base and demonstrate how endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) may be used as primary or adjunct surgical technique.

    Methods: A retrospective review was performed on 4 patients with penetrating skull base trauma at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center who underwent EES to assess for outcome and complications.

    Results: One patient had a nail traverse the cheek, maxillary sinus, medial orbit, tuberculum, and contralateral temporal lobe. It was removed using a combined endoscopic sublabial and endonasal approach, with an endonasal vascularized reconstruction. The second patient had the nail enter from the pterion, orbit and end in the sphenoid sinus. This was removed through a mini-pterional approach with EES release and repair of the resultant CSF leak. The third patient had a pitchfork enter the orbit, oral cavity, and maxilla with frontal and temporal lobe penetration. Initially repaired with a bifrontal craniotomy and pericranial flap, a CSF leak persisted and then underwent 2 EES approaches for 2 separate CSF leaks. The fourth patient had a wood stick enter the medial orbit, traverse the lamina papyracea and cribriform plate. Once removed under EES observation the CSF leak was repaired. With a minimum of 6 months follow up, all patients had uncomplicated and successful recovery.

    Conclusions: Traditional management of penetrating skull base trauma often includes an open approach with pericranial flap reconstruction. This series demonstrates that EES may offer similar results alone or in combination to ensure appropriate skull base evaluation and reconstruction.

    Patient Care: This provides alternative surgical options and management considerations for patient with penetrating skull base trauma.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1. Understand and formulate a multidisciplinary approach to identifying and providing initial management of penetrating skull base trauma. 2. Identify medical and surgical risks associated with penetrating skull base trauma. 3. Recognize the utility of Endoscopic Endonasal approaches in managing penetrating skull base trauma.

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy