Skip to main content
  • The Clipping vs Coiling Stalemate: A Ceasefire Declared for the Sake of Patient Safety in a Resource-challenged Setting

    Final Number:
    735

    Authors:
    Wilheminah Makhambeni MBChB; Rasik Gopal HOD of Neurosurgery

    Study Design:
    Clinical Trial

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2014 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Sir Victor Horsley, by treating a cerebral aneurysm in 1885, began a process that has made the therapy of vascular anomalies an accepted part of neurosurgery today. The unit, referred to in the study, sought to learn from its own history.

    Methods: We audited the patient population and the success of the management instituted during admission according to Lipschitz Neurological Unit's database within the period 2009-2012.

    Results: The clipping of the saccular vascular defects was the default management modality on account of the limited availability of coiling apparatus and of appropriately trained staff. This led to a majority of the patients being clipped, with only a 5.8% mortality but a 6.7% mortality in the coiled group - even before the long-term risk of rupture was factored into the equation. Both of the patients with fusiform aneurysms were HIV reactive, and had a good clinical outcome upon discharge on antiretrovirals - without direct vascular intervention.

    Conclusions: The practice of aneurysm management is poised to allow for the treatment of each case according to it’s merits and the conditions at the specific to the institution, for a revision of how we phrase the consent process, and for the individual patient/family’s preference to be the determining factors.

    Patient Care: We intend to establish that there is greater benefit in individualizing care, as the stance that endovascular or any other treatment is uniformly superior is inaccurate.

    Learning Objectives: • to audit the type and site of aneurysms encountered • to assess the mortality rate of respective interventions (coiling vs clipping) • to assess the rate of good clinical outcomes (WFNS Grade 1 or 2) • to evaluate the relation between outcomes, treatment modality and the site of aneurysms • to establish the type of aneurysms has a bearing on short-term outcomes in the study population

    References: Chowdhry SA, Spetzler RF. Genealogy of Training in Vascular Neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 2014;74:S198–S203 Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Derdeyn CP, et al. Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:993-1003 Kim TS, Joo SP, Lee JK, et al. Neuronavigation-assisted surgery for distal anterior cerebral artery aneurysm. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2007;50(3):140-144 Sorkin GC, Dumont TM, Eller JL, Mokin M, Snyder KV, Levy EI, Siddiqui AH, Hopkins LN. Cerebrovascular Neurosurgery in Evolution: The Endovascular Paradigm. Neurosurgery 2014;74:S191–S197 Dumont TM, Kan P, Snyder KV, Hopkins LN, Siddiqui AH, Levy EI. Revisiting angioplasty without stenting for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis after the stenting and aggressive medical management for preventing recurrent stroke in intracranial stenosis (SAMMPRIS) study. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(6):1103-1111 Brott TG, Hobson RW 2nd, Howard G, et al. Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(1):11-23 Kaku T, Watarai H, Kokuzawa J, Tanaka T, Andoh T. Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms: Surgical Clipping and Coil Embolization. Interv Neuroradiol. 2007;13(S1):68–72 Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet. 2005;366(9488): 809-817 Johnston SC, McDougall CG, Gholkar A, Turk A; MAPS Investigators. Abstract 182: death and disability after coil embolization of ruptured and unruptured aneurysms in the Matrix and Platinum Science (MAPS) trial. Stroke. 2012;43(2):A182 Koivist T, Vannine R, Husrkainen H, Saari T, Hernesniemi J, Vapalahti M. Outcomes of Early Endovascular Versus Surgical Treatment of Ruptured Cerebral Aneurysms: A Prospective Randomized Study. Stroke. 2000;31:2369-2377 Molyneux AJ, Kerr RSC, Stratton I, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 360: 1267-1274 Mitchell P, Kerr R, Mendelow AD, Molyneux A. Could late rebleeding overturn the superiority of cranial aneurysm coil embolization over clip ligation seen in ISAT? J Neurosurg. 2008:108:437-442 Dumont, TM, Eller JL, Mokin M, Sorkin GC, EDI Levy. Advances in Endovascular Approaches to Cerebral Aneurysms. Neurosurgery 74:S17–S31, 2014 Drake CG. Earlier times in aneurysm surgery. Clin Neurosurg. 1985;32:41-50

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy