Skip to main content
  • Evidence that Ly6Clow Macrophages Contribute to Spontaneous Recovery after Stroke

    Final Number:

    Yasuhiro Nishiyama; Ahmet Arac MD; Takeshi Hiu MD, PhD; Tonya Bliss PhD; Gary K. Steinberg MD PhD

    Study Design:
    Laboratory Investigation

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2013 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Understanding the mechanisms of post-stroke inflammation is essential to develop therapeutics that would promote recovery. Macrophages are known to promote both injury and repair in various pathologies, and these divergent properties may be due to different macrophage subtypes. Here, we investigated whether the brain macrophage subtypes alter the post-stroke outcome.

    Methods: C57BL/6 mice (11-14 weeks old) were subjected to transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAo). Flow cytometry was used to analyze the immune cells in brain, blood. To deplete blood monocytes, clodronate filled liposomes (CL) were used. Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-filled liposomes (PL) served as controls. Lesion size was assessed by TTC at 2d post-stroke and silver staining at 7d post-stroke.

    Results: A time-course analysis of immune cells after stroke identified two macrophage subpopulations in the brain with different temporal profiles: Ly6Chigh macrophages were the dominant cell population early after stroke, reaching a peak by 3d, and then decreasing in number by 5d. Conversely, the number of Ly6Clow macrophages were initially low and peaked by 5d. To investigate the effects of these cells, we used clodronate depletion of monocytes with different injection paradigms. Injecting clodronate 10 min plus 2d after stroke had no significant effect on infarct size at 2d and 7d post-stroke, or on functional deficit, compared to the PL group. However, when the injections were given every other day after stroke, from day 0 to day 6, CL-treated mice had significantly larger infarct sizes at 7d post-stroke (48.9±4.3 vs 35.6±5.8, % of contralateral hemisphere, n=10; p<0.01), and worse neurological scores (11.1±1.1 vs 6.2±1.1, n=10; p<0.01) than PL-treated mice. Furthermore, this injection paradigm resulted in significantly fewer Ly6Clow macrophages in the CL-treated group, suggesting a protective role for these cells.

    Conclusions: Macrophage subtypes may have distinct roles in promoting brain damage and recovery after stroke.

    Patient Care: Understanding the mechanisms of brain inflammation can give some information about indentifying therapeutic targets for stroke patients.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to understand the importance of macrophage subtypes for stroke.


We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy