In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • The Prevalence and Outcome of Traumatic Vertebral Artery Dissection: Analysis from National Trauma Data Base (NTDB)

    Final Number:
    1574

    Authors:
    Shahram Majidi MD; Farhan Siddiq MD; Vikram Jadhav MD, PhD; Malik Adil; Adnan I. Qureshi MD

    Study Design:
    Clinical Trial

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2013 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Vertebral artery dissection (VAD) is an important cause of stroke in young adults. The natural history and epidemiological aspects of traumatic VAD is not fully understood. We determined the prevalence and outcome of dissection of vertebral artery in trauma setting.

    Methods: All patients who were admitted with traumatic brain injury or head and neck injury were identified by ICD-9-CM codes from the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB), using data files from 2009 to 2010. NTDB represents one of the largest trauma databases and contains data from over 900 trauma centers across the United States. Presence of VAD was identified in these patients by using ICD-9-CM codes. Admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), in-hospital complications and treatment outcome were compared in patients with VAD with the patients without vascular dissection.

    Results: A total of 84 VAD patients were identified which comprised 0.01% of all patients admitted with head and neck injury. The mean age for patients with VAD was significantly higher than patients without dissection [46 (95% CI: 41-50) versus 41.3 (95% CI: 41.2-41.4); p=0.003]. The admission GCS score was significantly lower in patients with VAD with 31% of these patients presenting with GCS<9 (p<.0001). Patients with VAD had higher rate of in-hospital stroke than the patients without dissection (5% versus 0.2%; p<.0001). Numbers of ICU days, ventilator days, and hospital length of stays were all significantly higher in patients with VAD. These differences remained significant after adjusting for the demographics, admission GCS and ISS (p<.0001). Only 7% (N=6) of the patients with VAD received endovascular treatment and there was no in-hospital stroke in these patients. Patients with VAD had higher chance of discharge to nursing facility in comparison to head trauma patients without VAD (OR; 95% CI: 2.19; 1.38- 3.48. p<.0001).

    Conclusions: Although infrequent, vertebral artery dissection in head and neck trauma is associated with higher rates of in-hospital stroke and greater length of ICU and hospital stay. Considering the risks associated with anticoagulation in trauma setting, endovascular treatment may be an alternate option to reduce in-hospital complications in these patients.

    Patient Care: It will increase our knowledge about the prevalence and clinical significance of vertebral artery dissection in trauma patients which is mostly unknown.

    Learning Objectives: Due to the complexity of the trauma patients and the lack of clinical symptoms at the injury time, the early diagnosis of vertebral artery dissection is very difficult and demands a high index of suspicion. Therefore, the incidence of isolated vertebral artery injury in the setting of head and neck trauma is not very well understood. In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence of traumatic vertebral artery dissection and its impact on hospital outcome in patients with head and neck injury and traumatic brain injury, using a nationally representative database.

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy