In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Comparison of Fatigue Strength of Bicoritcal vs. Shorter Unicortical C2 pars Screws in a Goel-Harms Construct

    Final Number:
    1527

    Authors:
    Brian Su MD; Adam Shimer MD; Suresh Chinthakunta MS; Kanaan Salloum BS; Christopher P. Ames MD; Alexander R. Vaccaro MD PhD; Brandon Bucklen PhD

    Study Design:
    Laboratory Investigation

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2013 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: In cases where there is a high riding or medialized vertebral artery, use of a longer screw could potentially place the vertebral artery at increased risk.

    Methods: In vitro testing was performed using 15 cadaveric specimens (C0-C3). C1-C2 fixation using the standard Goel-Harms construct was used. All C1 screws were bicortical, 3.5 mm in diameter, and a length sufficient to have bicortical fixation in the lateral mass of C1. Specimens were randomized into three groups of 5 specimens each (Figure 1): (1) Bilateral long C2 pedicle screws (26-32 mm), (2) Bilateral short C2 pars screws (14mm in length), (3) Unilateral long and a contralateral short C2 pars screw. The propensity for screw loosening was simulated via repeated physiological loading on Spine Simulator (MTS Systems Inc, Eden Prarie, MN). Multidirectional flexibility before- and after-cyclic loading along with micro-motion of C2 screws was recorded. Screw pull-out testing using a custom-designed-fixture was performed to characterize the residual strength of each screw type following cyclic loading.

    Results: Screw loosening was observed in three screws; two C2 pars-screws and one C1 lateral-mass screw. The spines became 28% more flexible compared to their intact state, following cyclic loading. Long C2 pedicle-screw exhibited greater stiffness compared to short C2 pars- scew post-cyclic loading, particularly in axial rotation. Bilateral long C2 pedicle-screws demonstrated greater reduction in mean pre-cyclic motion compared to bilateral short C2 pars-screw. The mean reduction in pre-cyclic motion achieved by combination of a long and a contralateral short C2 pars-screw was comparable to bilateral long C2 pedicle-screw. Bicortical long C2 pedicle-screws had significantly higher (94%) pullout strength compared to shorter unicortical C2 pars-screw

    Conclusions: Long C2 pedicle-screw limited motion better compared to short C2 pars screw. Long C2 pedicle-screws provided significantly increased fixation strength compared to short C2 pars-screw during pull-out.

    Patient Care: Such a study would provide valuable information to clinicians to weigh the risks and benefits of using a pedicle or pars screw in a C1-C2 construct.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this study, participants should be able to compare the biomechanical characteristics of three different types of C2 fixation in a Goel-Harms C1-C2 posterior screw-rod fusion construct: (1) Bilateral long C2 pedicle screws, (2) Bilateral short C2 pars screws, (3) Unilateral long C2 pedicle screw with a contralateral short C2 pars screw.

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy