Skip to main content
  • Correlation Between Intraoperative Endplate Violation and Subsidence of Polyetheretherketone Intervertebral Cages in Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion

    Final Number:

    Vijay Agarwal MD; Jacob H. Bagley BS; T. Ryan Owens MD; Kemp Knott BS; Robert E. Isaacs MD

    Study Design:

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2013 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) has become a well accepted alternative to anterior/posterior approaches to the lumbar spine. While subsidence remains a major concern, it has not been well characterized. The purpose of this study is to investigate the incidence of subsidence with XLIF procedures, and to present any correlation with intraoperative endplate breach.

    Methods: IRB approved retrospective review of 164 thoracolumbar levels in 45 patients with an XLIF procedure done between 2008 and 2012. Intraoperative images were reviewed for clear endplate damage. At follow-up appointments, radiographs were reviewed for subsidence. The role of demographic and operative data was analyzed.

    Results: Subsidence occurred in 69% of patients at any level, and 38% of total levels. 23% of levels had radiographic evidence of intraoperative endplate violation. When subsidence occurred, the cage migrated into the inferior body 50% of the time, superior body 26% of the time, and both 24% of the time. Levels found to have intraoperative endplate violation tended to have later subsidence. 46.4% of levels with endplate violation developed severe subsidence, versus 13.2% of levels without endplate violation that eventually developed severe subsidence. 71.8% of levels with endplate violation developed subsidence of any severity, while 27.3% of levels without endplate violation developed any radiographic evidence of subsidence (p < 0.0001 for all comparisons). Direction of endplate violation was associated with a correlated direction of subsidence (p < 0.0001). The presence of an intraoperative endplate violation increased the risk of subsidence by more than 770% (OR: 7.77, p < 0.0001). Intraoperative endplate violation increased the risk of severe subsidence by more than 660% (OR: 6.62, p < 0.0001).

    Conclusions: Intraoperative endplate violation during extreme lateral interbody fusion is a major risk factor for the development of subsidence, as it predicts both subsidence direction and severity.

    Patient Care: Our research will help surgeons effectively utilize the XLIF procedure in the care of their patients and help improve outcomes by minimizing the incidence of subsidence.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1) Describe the importance of intraoperative parameters on the incidence of subsidence with XLIF procedures, 2) Discuss, in small groups, what increases the risk for the eventual subsidence postoperatively, 3) Identify an effective treatment to minimize the risks of the development of subsidence after an XLIF procedure.

    References: Eck JC, Hodges S, Humphreys SC. Minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2007;15(6):321-9. Epub 2007/06/06. PubMed PMID: 17548881 Karikari IO, Nimjee SM, Hardin CA, Hughes BD, Hodges TR, Mehta AI, et al. Extreme lateral interbody fusion approach for isolated thoracic and thoracolumbar spine diseases: initial clinical experience and early outcomes. Journal of spinal disorders & techniques. 2011;24(6):368-75. Epub 2010/12/15. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181ffefd2. PubMed PMID: 21150667

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy