In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • A Single Institution Cranioplasty Series Spanning 15 Years

    Final Number:
    1293

    Authors:
    Marc Christopher Manix MD; Justin Haydel MD; David E. Connor DO; Anil Nanda MD FACS

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2013 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: We present a single institution’s experience with cranioplasty over the last fifteen years.

    Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review. 130 patients from 1998 to 2013 underwent a total of 141 operations for cranioplasty. We looked at complication rates, specifically the incidence of infection and re-operation for evacuation of a fluid collection or hematoma. This was then compared to complications seen in the smaller cohort of patient-specific synthetic PEEK bone flaps.

    Results: A total of 141 procedures were performed over this time period for reasons that could be grouped as follows: replacement of bone flap removed in an emergent procedure (45%), replacement of infected bone flap (17%), replacement after en bloc resection (21%); and partial cranioplasty to repair skull fractures or for cosmesis (17%). There were 15 infections (11%) post-operatively in the non-synthetic group. Three of these needed multiple surgeries for washout or revision, and the microbiology for all three was MRSA. 4% of the non-synthetic group needed surgical evacuation of a hematoma or fluid collection in the epidural space. A total of 8 patient specific synthetic flaps were used with the following complications: 2/8 had infections, 2/8 needed emergent evacuation of an epidural hematoma, and 2/8 had non-operative epidural hematomas seen on post-operative imaging.

    Conclusions: There are various reasons for needing to perform a cranioplasty. Infection with MRSA portends an unfavorable course, and patient specific synthetic bone flaps have a higher percentage of complications when compared to other types of implants.

    Patient Care: Identify the risks for complications of this procedure and generate discussion on the best way to avoid these complications.

    Learning Objectives: Review the indications for cranioplasty, the various methods used, and the potential complications; and compare to the newer, patient specific synthetic bone flaps that are now available.

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy