Skip to main content
  • Treatment of Posterior Circulation Aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device

    Final Number:
    1080

    Authors:
    Nohra Chalouhi MD; Stavropoula I. Tjoumakaris MD; Aaron S. Dumont MD; L. Fernando Gonzalez MD; Ciro G. Randazzo MD; Robert M. Starke MD MSc; Robert H. Rosenwasser MD, FACS, FAHA; Pascal Jabbour MD

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2013 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device (PED) has become common practice in neurovascular centers. Very few studies have assessed the safety and efficacy of PED treatment for posterior circulation aneurysms. The purpose of this study was to present our experience with use of the PED in the posterior circulation.

    Methods: A total of 7 patients harboring 7 posterior circulation aneurysms were treated with the PED at our institution between November 2011 and July 2012.

    Results: Aneurysm size was 14.1 mm on average. All patients had unruptured aneurysms. Three aneurysms arose from the vertebral artery, 2 from the basilar artery, and 2 from the vertebrobasilar junction. A single stent was used in 4 patients, 2 stents in 2 patients, and 3 stents in 1 patient. Treatment was successful in all 7 patients. No procedural complications or perforator infarcts were noted in the series. No patient experienced new neurological symptoms related to PED treatment during the follow-up period. Angiographic follow-up was available for 6 patients at a mean time point of 5.5 months. Follow-up angiography showed 100% aneurysm occlusion in 3 patients, marked decrease in aneurysm size in 2 patients, and no change in 1 patient.

    Conclusions: In our initial experience, it appears that PED treatment in select patients with vertebrobasilar aneurysms may have a reasonable safety-efficacy profile.

    Patient Care: In this study, we present our experience with the PED in the posterior circulation. Factors that may explain our favorable results as compared to previous literature are discussed.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1) Describe the safety and efficacy of the PED in the posterior circulation 2) Identify factors that may improve procedural safety

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy