In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm: Long-term Outcome and Prognostic Factors, with Emphasis on Delayed Cure.

    Final Number:
    1011

    Authors:
    Park Jong Hyon; SangWook Kim

    Study Design:
    Clinical Trial

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2013 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: The postoperative course of microvascular decompression (MVD) for hemifacial spasm (HFS) is variable, and the optimal time for assessing the results is unclear.

    Methods: From April 1997 to October 2007, MVD for HFS was performed in 801 patients. Patients were divided into two groups (cured or failed) according to subjective patient assessments over a 3-year period. We analyzed patient characteristics and surgical findings to determine prognostic factors. Medical records were analyzed retrospectively over the 3-year follow-up period.

    Results: Of the 801 patients who underwent surgery, 743 (92.8 %) appeared to be cured, 70 (8.7 %) had residual or recurrent spasms more than 1 year after surgery, 11 (1.3 %) had gradual improvement over 3 years, and 1 (0.1 %) had delayed improvement more than 3 years after surgery. Fifty-eight patients (7.2 %) had residual or recurrent spasms more than 3 years after surgery, of which 19 (2.4 %) had recurrence after initial relief. The mean time to spasm recurrence was 18.9 months. Intraoperative resolution of the lateral spread response (LSR) after decompression (p?=?0.048) and severe indentation (p?=?0.038) were significant predictors of good long-term outcome after MVD for HFS. In our series, 70 patients (8.7 %) had residual or recurrent spasms more than 1 year after surgery, of which 12 (17.1 %) improved gradually after 1 year.

    Conclusions: If the surgeon can confirm intraoperative resolution of the LSR and severe indentation, reoperation can be delayed until 3 years after MVD.

    Patient Care: Reoperation after MVD will be decreased and decision of failure will be delayed if the surgeon can confirm intraoperative resolution of the LSR and severe indentation

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to : 1)Descirbe the importance of intraoperative resolution of the LSR and severe indentation, 2) delay reoperation until 3 years after MVD.

    References: 1.Park K, Hong SH, Hong SD, Cho YS, Chung WH, Ryu NG (2009) Patterns of hearing loss after microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 80:1165–1167 2.Chung SS, Chang JW, Kim SH, Chang JH, Park YG, Kim DI (2000) Microvascular decompression of the facial nerve for the treatment of hemifacial spasm: preoperative magnetic resonance imaging related to clinical outcomes. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 142:901–906, discussion 907 3. Gardner JW, Sava GA (1962) Hemifacial spasm: a reversible pathophysiologic state. J Neurosurg 19:240–247 4. Hyun SJ, Kong DS, Park K (2010) Microvascular decompression for treating hemifacial spasm: lessons learned from a prospective study of 1,174 operations. Neurosurg Rev 33:325–334, discussion 334 5.Jannetta PJ (1977) Observations on the etiology of trigeminal neuralgia, hemifacial spasm, acoustic nerve dysfunction and glossopharyngeal neuralgia. Definitive microsurgical treatment and results in 117 patients. Neurochirurgia (Stuttg) 20:145–154 6.Jannetta PJ, Resnick D (1996) Cranial rhizopathies. In: Youmans JR (ed) Neurological surgery: a comprehensive reference guide to the diagnosis and management of neurosurgical problems, 4th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 3563–3574 7.Moller AR (1997) Pathophysiology of hemifacial spasm. In: Sindou M, Keravel Y, Moller AR (eds) Hemifacial spasm: a multidisciplinary approach. Springer, New York, pp 51–62 8. Samii M, Gunther T, Iaconetta G, Muehling M, Vorkapic P, Samii A (2002) Microvascular decompression to treat hemifacial spasm: long-term results for a consecutive series of 143 patients. Neurosurgery 50:712–718, discussion 718-719 9.Kim HR, Rhee DJ, Kong DS, Park K (2009) Prognostic factors of hemifacial spasm after microvascular decompression. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 45:336–340 10.Kong DS, Park K, Shin BG, Lee JA, Eum DO (2007) Prognostic value of the lateral spread response for intraoperative electromyography monitoring of the facial musculature during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. J Neurosurg 106:384–387 11.Park JS, Kong DS, Lee JA, Park K (2008) Hemifacial spasm: neurovascular compressive patterns and surgical significance. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 150:235–241, discussion 241 12.Hitotsumatsu T, Matsushima T, Inoue T (2003) Microvascular decompression for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia, hemifacial spasm, and glossopharyngeal neuralgia: three surgical approach variations: technical note. Neurosurgery 53:1436–1441, discussion 1442-1433 13.Park JS, Kong DS, Lee JA, Park K (2007) Intraoperative management to prevent cerebrospinal fluid leakage after microvascular decompression: dural closure with a "plugging muscle" method. Neurosurg Rev 30:139–142, discussion 142 14.Moller AR, Jannetta PJ (1985) Microvascular decompression in hemifacial spasm: intraoperative electrophysiological observations. Neurosurgery 16:612–618 15.Li CS (2005) Varied patterns of postoperative course of disappearance of hemifacial spasm after microvascular decompression. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 147:617–620, discussion 620 16.Sindou M, Keravel Y (2009) Neurosurgical treatment of primary hemifacial spasm with microvascular decompression. Neurochirurgie 55:236–247 17.Sanders DB (1989) Ephaptic transmission in hemifacial spasm: a single-fiber EMG study. Muscle Nerve 12:690–694 18.Saito S, Moller AR, Jannetta PJ, Jho HD (1993) Abnormal response from the sternocleidomastoid muscle in patients with spasmodic torticollis: observations during microvascular decompression operations. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 124:92–98 19.Park JS, Kong DS, Lee JA, Park K (2008) Chronologic analysis of symptomatic change following microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: value for predicting midterm outcome. Neurosurg Rev 31:413–418, discussion 418-419 20.Yamaki T, Hashi K, Niwa J et al (1992) Results of reoperation for failed microvascular decompression. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 115(1–2):1–7 21.Wilson CB, Yorke C, Prioleau G (1980) Microsurgical vascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia and hemifacial spasm. West J Med 132:481–487 22.Park YS, Chang JH, Cho J, Park YG, Chung SS, Chang JW (2006) Reoperation for persistent or recurrent hemifacial spasm after microvascular decompression. Neurosurgery 58:1162–1167, discussion 1162-1167

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy