In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Rethinking Autoregulation in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Majority of Patients with Disruptive Dynamic Autoregulation Do Not Respond to an Elevated Cerebral Perfusion Pressure

    Final Number:
    150

    Authors:
    Eric C. Peterson MD, MS; Kathleen Tozer MD; Wendy Cohen; Arthur M. Lam; Randall Matthew Chesnut MD

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2012 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: It is widely accepted that pressure autoregulation is often disrupted after traumatic brain injury, based on studies using dynamic testing. The response to cerebral blood flow augmentation in such patients has not been evaluated. We hypothesized that augmenting systemic blood pressure with pressors would not change cerebral blood flow in patients that had disrupted dynamic autoregulation by TCD.

    Methods: We conducted autoregulation testing on a consecutive series of severe TBI patients treated at Harborview Medical Center from 2009-2010. All patients underwent placement of a Licox intracranial pressure monitor and brain tissue oxygen probe. Each patient underwent dynamic testing with TCD (thigh-cuff method) and static autoregulation testing with CT perfusion. A CTP was performed at a baseline CPP and then repeated at an elevated CPP of 20mmHg above baseline. The two CTP blood flow maps were compared to assess the cerebrovascular response to the CPP challenge.

    Results: Autoregulation testing was performed in 81 patients. 84% were performed in the first 48 hours, and 56% in the first 24 hours. Three patterns of CPA disruption emerged: 48% had intact static CPA but disrupted dynamic CPA, 40% had disrupted static and dynamic CPA, and 12% had intact static and dynamic CPA. The pattern of disrupted static and intact dynamic CPA was not seen.

    Conclusions: Testing both static and dynamic CPA in the same patient suggests that the global CPA reflex has separate components and that dynamic CPA testing can demonstrate an impaired latency while static CPA testing may show that the overall capacity of CPA is intact. The majority of patients with disrupted dynamic autoregulation by TCD testing do not demonstrate improved perfusion when CPP was increased. This suggests the traditional concept of autoregulation in TBI needs to be reconsidered in light of at least two underlying mechanisms.

    Patient Care: Less pressor use for patients that show disrupted autoregulation on TCD. Better understanding of the complexity of autoregulation in TBI

    Learning Objectives: Role of autoregulation testing in traumatic brain injury Lack of improved perfusion in patients with disrupted autoregulaiton

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy