In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Complications in 51 Consecutive Patients Undergoing Cranioplasty following Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Brain Injury

    Final Number:
    1387

    Authors:
    Angelos G. Kolias MSc, MRCS; Vin S. Ban; Lucia M. Li; Thomas Santarius MD; Peter J. Kirkpatrick FRCS; Peter J. Hutchinson PhD, FRCS (SN)

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2012 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Cranioplasty to repair the skull defect following craniectomy aims to restore skull integrity and improve cosmesis. It has also been suggested that it may facilitate rehabilitation after TBI.

    Methods: This retrospective single-centre study reviewed a series of consecutive TBI patients who underwent a cranioplasty from January 2008 to December 2010, with the aim of identifying complications. Data on operations, complications and patient characteristics were extracted from operating theatre registers and patient records.

    Results: 51 cranioplasties were identified. All plates inserted were titanium. The DC was unilateral in 39 and bifrontal in 12 cases. The median time between DC and cranioplasty was 9 months (Q1 – Q3: 6 – 12 months). The median follow-up time was 27 months (range 8 – 39 months). Mortality (30-day) was zero. Eleven cases returned to theatre: 5 (9.8%) for removal of infected plate, 5 (9.8%) for revision (1 after fall, 1 for loose portion, 1 for discomfort, 2 for cosmesis) and 1 (2%) for evacuation of an extradural haematoma secondary to therapeutic anticoagulation. The mean time between cranioplasty and removal of an infected plate was 15 weeks (range 4 – 56 weeks). MSSA was cultured from 4 and MRSA from 1 of the infected cases. Four of the 5 patients who developed an infection had a pertinent co-morbidity (smoking, diabetes, immune-suppression, previous cranioplasty removal) compared to 15 out of 46 without an infection (p=0.058). In 2 out of 6 patients who were established on anti-convulsants for seizures pre-cranioplasty, seizures recurred immediately post-operatively; 1 of them required ITU admission. No patients experienced new-onset seizures after cranioplasty.

    Conclusions: The most commonly occurring complications were infection, revision and seizures. The complication rate in this series is comparable to that reported in the literature. Prospective multi-centre studies have the potential to answer important clinical questions (such as optimal timing) regarding cranioplasty.

    Patient Care: We are proposing prospective multi-centre studies in order to answer important clinical questions (such as optimal timing) regarding cranioplasty.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to describe the complications of cranioplasty.

    References: 1. Gooch MR et al. Neurosurg Focus 2009 2. Stiver SI. Neurosurg Focus 2009 Acknowledgements: AGK is supported by a Royal College of Surgeons of England Research Fellowship, an NIHR Academic Clinical Fellowship and a Raymond and Beverly Sackler Studentship. PJH is supported by an Academy of Medical Sciences/Health Foundation Senior Surgical Scientist Fellowship.

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy