In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Atlanto-axial fusion following C1-C2 facetoplasty. A long term CT study of 21 patients

    Final Number:
    1386

    Authors:
    John M. Duff MD, FACS

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2012 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: The standard technique for bone grafting for atlanto-axial fusion to treat atlanto-axial instability is tricortical graft between the posterior elements of C1 and C2. This is unfavorable for bone fusion, as the posterior elements of C1 and C2 are mostly cortical bone, the bridging distance is large, and the graft is not exposed to loading forces. We have been using the facet "jamming" technique or facetoplasty, without any posterior grafting as a more physiological alternative. This study looks at the efficacy of this technique using CT.

    Methods: We retrospectively examined our C1-C2 fixation experience over 6 years. The technique involved drilling the C1-C2 facets and filling them with autologous bone graft, following C2 nerve root division. Instrumentation techniques were either transarticular or Goel/Harms technique or a combination thereof. Of a total of 63 patients, 21 had a CT scan a least 1 year after surgery. Ten patients had unstable fractures, eleven had chronic atlanto-axial instability due to various conditions

    Results: Fusion was judged by clearly visible solid bone bridging between articular surfaces of C1 and C2 on CT, with absence of bone resorption around the implants. Eighteen patients had unequivocal fusion on CT, three had a stable non-union. Of these, two did not have any movement visible on flexion/extension X rays, the other had slight movement. Of the three, two were over 75 years old, and the third had choreoathetosis, which may have compromised immobilisation in the post-operative period. There were no clinical complications in the series, and no patient needed revision surgery on follow-up. Only one patient tolerated poorly numbness related to C2 division.

    Conclusions: C1-C2 facetoplasty appears to be a safe and effective alternative method of bone grafting for C1-C2 arthrodesis. CT is a very reliable method for assessing bone fusion Facetoplasty avoids tricortical graft harvesting and sublaminar wiring Facetoplasty may be an appropriate technique for patients with non-intact posterior elements.

    Patient Care: By providing alternative methods of bone grafting with potentially less morbidity. Fusion is only truly assessed on CT

    Learning Objectives: Facetoplasty is an alternative to traditional bone grafting techniques for C1-C2 arthrodesis. C2 nerve root division has not been a significant clinical problem.

    References: Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine July 2007 / Vol. 7 / No. 1 / Pages 90-94 CASE REPORTS AND TECHNICAL NOTES Atlantoaxial joint jamming as a treatment for atlantoaxial dislocation: a preliminary report Technical note Atul Goel, M.Ch.

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy