In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Comparison of Motion Changes and Clinical Outcomes between Cervical Disc Replacement and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Single Level Cervical Degenerative Disease

    Final Number:
    391

    Authors:
    Jae-Won Jang; Jung-Kil Lee MD; Sang-Deok Kim; Hyung-Sik Moon; Bo-Ra Seo MD; Tae-Sun Kim; Soo-Han Kim

    Study Design:
    Clinical Trial

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2012 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: The aim of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of CTDR by comparing it with ACDF in the treatment of single-level cervical degenerative disease, retrospectively.

    Methods: This study included 61 patients, who underwent either stand-alone single-level ACDF (n = 33) or single-level CTDR (Bryan cervical artificial disc, n = 28) at C3 to C7 for degenerative cervical disease between June 2007 and December 2009. Cervical flexion, extension, and neutral lateral radiographs were obtained before surgery, immediately after surgery, at 1 and 12 months and annually after surgery to measure the overall cervical sagittal angle (CSA, C2-7 angle) and segmental angle (SA) of the treated level. Range-of-motion (ROM) of overall cervical spine (C2-7), treated level, and upper and lower adjacent segments were also measured. For evaluation for patient's pain, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for axial and radicular pain were measured, and the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score was measured to assess the patient's functional state.

    Results: The average follow-up period was 26.7 months and 22.8 months in the ACDF and CTDR groups, respectively. The SA was maintained at a significantly higher level in the CTDR group compared to the ACDF group during follow-up period (p < 0.05). The ROM of the the upper adjacent segment was significantly increased in the ACDF group compared to the CTDR group. However, there was no significant difference of the ROM of the lower adjacent segment between the two groups at the last follow-up. The clinical results according to the JOA and VAS scoring systems were not significantly different between the two groups.

    Conclusions: CTDR using a Bryan artificial disc provided a significant maintenance of the SA and the ROM at the treated level and prevented the hyper-mobility at the upper adjacent segment compared to ACDF.

    Patient Care: The information about ASD developing after cervical surgery will reduce the developing of clinical ASD

    Learning Objectives: The study about effectiveness of CTDR

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy