In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Racial Disparities in Medicaid Patients after Brain Tumor Surgery

    Final Number:

    Debraj Mukherjee MD, MPH; Chirag G. Patil MD MS; Nathan Todnem; Beatrice Ugiliweneza MSPH; Miriam Nuno PhD; Michael Kinsman MD; Shivanand P. Lad MD PhD; Maxwell Boakye MD

    Study Design:

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2012 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Healthcare disparities remain a widespread societal and health policy issue. We investigated racial disparities among an otherwise homogenous cohort of post-operative Medicaid patients with meningioma or malignant/benign/metastatic brain tumors.

    Methods: We used the Medicaid component of the MarketScan database (2000-2009) to primarily compare Caucasians and African-Americans undergoing craniotomy for primary or metastatic brain tumors. Univariate and multivariate analyses assessed death, 30-day post-operative complications, adverse discharge disposition, length of stay (LOS), and adjust total charges.

    Results: Our study identified 2,321 patients. A majority were Caucasian (73.7%) and female (57.9%) with Charlson comorbidity scores <3 (56.2%) and treated at low-volume centers (73.4%). Approximately 26.3% were African-American; 22.1% had meningiomas. Inpatient mortality was 2.0%, mean LOS was 9 days, mean adjusted total charges were $42,422, adverse discharge disposition occurred in 22.5%, and the 30-day complication rate was 23.35%. In bivariate analysis of all tumor types, African-Americans had significantly longer LOS (3 additional days, p<0.001), higher charges ($17,356, p<0.001), and complication rates 3.7% higher (p=0.04) than Caucasian counterparts. While similar trends were noted across tumor types, meningioma patients showed the widest racial disparities. In multivariate analysis, African-Americans with meningiomas had higher odds of developing a complication (p=0.05), having greater LOS (p<0.001), and incurring higher charges (p<0.001) than Caucasians. The presence of one complication doubled both LOS and total charges, while two complications tripled both LOS and total charges.

    Conclusions: African-Americans had significantly higher post-operative complications than Caucasians within a relatively homogenous Medicaid population with similar access to care and of similar socioeconomic background. This higher rate of complications drove greater healthcare utilization, including greater LOS and total charges, among African-Americans. Interventions aimed at reducing complications among African-American brain tumor patients may help reduce post-operative disparities and improve the cost-effectiveness of brain tumor surgery.

    Patient Care: Disparities in care have been well-document throughout the medical literature but have been incompletely described within the neurosurgical literature. This study documents the deep health care disparities evident within an otherwise homogenous subset of operative brain tumor patients. Furthermore, this study focuses the clinican and policymaker upon complication avoidance as the single greatest predictor of outcome disparities among neurosurgical brain tumor patients with primary or metastatic disease.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1. Describe the specific disparities seen in short- and long-term outcomes among brain tumor patients undergoing craniotomy for primary versus metastatic disease as well as between different racial subsets. 2. Identify complication avoidance as the greatest predictor of short- and long-term outcomes among post-operative brain tumor patients of varying race and tumor subtypes.

    References: 1. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(26):2635-45. 2. Asch SM, Kerr EA, Keesey J, et al. Who is at greatest risk for receiving poor-quality health care? N Engl J Med. 2006;354(11):1147-56. 3. Morris AM, Rhoads KF, Stain SC, Birkmeyer JD. Understanding racial disparities in cancer treatment and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(1):105-13. 4. Sherwood PR, Dahman BA, Donovan HS, Mintz A, Given CW, Bradley CJ. Treatment disparities following the diagnosis of an astrocytoma. J Neurooncol. 2011;101(1):67-74. 5. BD S, AY S, AR N, editors. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2003. 6. Masi CM, Gehlert S. Perceptions of breast cancer treatment among African-American women and men: implications for interventions. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(3):408-14. 7. Haider AH, Sexton J, Sriram N, et al. Association of unconscious race and social class bias with vignette-based clinical assessments by medical students. JAMA. 2011;306(9):942-51. 8. Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Sloan AE, Schwartz AG. Racial differences in survival after diagnosis with primary malignant brain tumor. Cancer. 2003;98(3):603-9. 9. Robertson JT, Gunter BC, Somes GW. Racial differences in the incidence of gliomas: a retrospective study from Memphis, Tennessee. Br J Neurosurg. 2002;16(6):562-6. 10. Curry WT, Carter BS, Barker FG. Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in patient outcomes after craniotomy for tumor in adult patients in the United States, 1988-2004. Neurosurgery. 2010;66(3):427-37; discussion 37-8. 11. Mukherjee D, Zaidi HA, Kosztowski T, et al. Disparities in access to neuro-oncologic care in the United States. Arch Surg. 2010;145(3):247-53. 12. Curry WT, Barker FG. Racial, ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in the treatment of brain tumors. J Neurooncol. 2009;93(1):25-39. 13. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83. 14. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(6):613-9. 15. Long DM, Gordon T, Bowman H, et al. Outcome and cost of craniotomy performed to treat tumors in regional academic referral centers. Neurosurgery. 2003;52(5):1056-63; discussion 63-5. 16. El-Sayed AM, Ziewacz JE, Davis MC, et al. Insurance status and inequalities in outcomes after neurosurgery. World Neurosurg. 2011;76(5):459-66. 17. Dasenbrock HH, Wolinsky JP, Sciubba DM, Witham TF, Gokaslan ZL, Bydon A. The impact of insurance status on outcomes after surgery for spinal metastases. Cancer. 2012;10. 18. Claus EB, Bondy ML, Schildkraut JM, Wiemels JL, Wrensch M, Black PM. Epidemiology of intracranial meningioma. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(6):1088-95; discussion -95. 19. Wong J, Mendelsohn D, Nyhof-Young J, Bernstein M. A qualitative assessment of the supportive care and resource needs of patients undergoing craniotomy for benign brain tumours. Support Care Cancer. 2011;19(11):1841-8. 20. Bradley CJ, Given CW, Roberts C. Race, socioeconomic status, and breast cancer treatment and survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(7):490-6. 21. Pittard WB, Laditka JN, Laditka SB. Associations between maternal age and infant health outcomes among Medicaid-insured infants in South Carolina: mediating effects of socioeconomic factors. Pediatrics. 2008;122(1):e100-6. 22. Sherwood PR, Stommel M, Murman DL, Given CW, Given BA. Primary malignant brain tumor incidence and Medicaid enrollment. Neurology. 2004;62(10):1788-93. 23. Downie DL, Schmid D, Plescia MG, et al. Racial disparities in blood pressure control and treatment differences in a Medicaid population, North Carolina, 2005-2006. Prev Chronic Dis. 2011;8(3):A55. 24. Kim SH, Ferrante J, Won BR, Hameed M. Barriers to adequate follow-up during adjuvant therapy may be important factors in the worse outcome for Black women after breast cancer treatment. World J Surg Oncol. 2008;6:26. 25. Morris AM, Billingsley KG, Hayanga AJ, Matthews B, Baldwin LM, Birkmeyer JD. Residual treatment disparities after oncology referral for rectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(10):738-44.

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy