In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Free-hand External Ventricular Drain Placement: Accuracy and Complications Rates on a Preliminary Prospective Observational Study.

    Final Number:
    1122

    Authors:
    Sophie Schuind MD; Olivier Jean De Witte MD, PhD; Michael Bruneau MD

    Study Design:
    Clinical Trial

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2012 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Few prospective studies have analyzed catheter position accuracy and procedure-related complications, although external ventricular drain (EVD) placement represents a common procedure. Our study was designed to prospectively collect these results.

    Methods: Since November 2009, all patients requiring EVD placement underwent a postoperative CT scan to check EVD position and hemorrhage rates. EVD accuracy was graded based on catheter tip position and trajectory: an optimal placement in the foramen of Monro or ipsilateral frontal horn corresponded to grade 1, a suboptimal placement in other CSF spaces to grade 2, and misplacement with catheter tip or path passing respectively through non-eloquent or eloquent parenchyma to grades 3 or 4.

    Results: Sixty-six EVDs were placed in 50 patients. Grades 1 to 4 were noted respectively in 58%, 9%, 18% and 15%. Out of 22 grades 3 and 4, 10 (45%) EVDs needed to be replaced while only one grade 1 EVD became non-functional after 3 days (p<0.001). Statistical significant risk of misplacement were Evans index lower than 0.2 (p=0.04) and intracranial catheter length longer than 6.5 cm (p<0.001), while surgeon’s experience and preoperative midline shift were not. Six postoperative hemorrhages were observed either along the EVD tract (n=5) or in the ventricles (n=1). All were of small size and none required drainage. Multiple attempts to insert EVD were a statistical significant hemorrhage risk factor (p<0.001) while coagulation disorders were not associated with a higher risk.

    Conclusions: Similarly to the literature, our preliminary study suggests that free-hand EVD insertion has a low accuracy and potential complications. Too deep catheter insertion is the main procedure-related pitfall that could be easily avoided. Multiple attempts represent the main risk factor of hemorrhages.

    Patient Care: By avoiding several pitfalls during free-hand EVD insertion, EVD complication rate could be decreased

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1) Better understand the importance of EVD complications 2) Identify ways to better avoid them in their current practice.

    References: 1. Kakarla and al, Safety and accuracy of bedside external ventricular drain placement., Neurosurgery. 2008 Jul;63(1 Suppl 1):ONS162-6; discussion ONS166-7. 2. Park and al, Accuracy and Safety of Bedside External Ventricular Drain Placement at Two Different Cranial Sites : Kocher’s Point versus Forehead, J Korean Neurosurg Soc 50 : 317-321, 2011 3. Huyette and al, Accuracy of the freehand pass technique for ventriculostomy catheter placement: retrospective assessment using computed tomography scans.J Neurosurg. 2008 Jan;108(1):88-91. 4. Gardner and al, Hemorrhage rates after external ventricular drain placement. J Neurosurg. 2009 May;110(5):1021-5.

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy