Skip to main content
  • Computed Tomography Based Anatomical Study to Assess Feasibility of Pedicle Screw Placement in the Lumbar and Lower Thoracic Pediatric Spine

    Final Number:
    171

    Authors:
    Kashif Ajaz Shaikh MD; Garrett Bennett BS; Ian Kainoa White MD; Carli Bullis BA, MSIV; Daniel H. Fulkerson MD

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2012 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Pedicle screw fixation has a number of advantages over other methods of spine instrumentation. The anatomy of the pedicle is complex, however there are basic dimensions important for planning screw placement. Pedicle anatomy has been studied extensively in adults; however, there are only a few small studies examining the anatomy in children. This study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of pedicle screw placement in children aged 5-16, based on key anatomic dimensions.

    Methods: The CT scans of 102 consecutive children evaluated at Riley Hospital for Children were studied. The parameters of the pedicle isthmus width (W), estimation of screw length (L) and axial angle (A) were recorded for 1632 pedicles from T10 through L5. Patients were divided into four age groups: Group A (5-7 years old), B (8-10 years), C (11-13 years), and D (14-16 years). Statistical analysis was performed evaluating the difference between genders and of the particular anatomy at the thoracolumbar junction (T12 to L1).

    Results: The pedicles increase in both L and W from T10-T12 and from L1-L5. L1 has a consistently smaller W compared to T12 in both genders over all age ranges. Estimating a W of 4.5 mm necessary for safe screw placement, we calculate that virtually all pedicles of T12 and L3-5 are large enough for screw placement in both genders after age 8. L4 and L5 are large enough for screw placement in both genders in the youngest age range. The pedicle dimensions increase with age, with the largest percentage of growth between Group A and B.

    Conclusions: Most of the pedicles of the lower lumbar spine and T12 are large enough to house the smallest commercially available screw, estimating a necessary W of 4.5 mm. Understanding the anatomy at the thoracolumbar junction is important, as the W of L1 is consistently smaller than T12.

    Patient Care: Pedicle screw fixation has a number of advantages over other methods of instrumentation, however the placement of screws in a smaller pedicle may be challenging. While thoracolumbar pedicle morphology has been well studied in adults, such studies are lacking in pediatric patients. We feel a thorough understanding of the anatomy in the growing pediatric spine is vital for the effective application of pedicle screw fixation to the pediatric patient population.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1) Describe the importance of pedicle anatomy in assessing the feasibility of pedicle screw fixation. 2) Discuss pedicle morphology of the pediatric lumbar and lower thoracic spine. 3) Understand the anatomy of the pediatric thoracolumbar junction and its implications for screw placement.

    References: References: 1. Banta CJ, 2nd, King AG, Dabezies EJ, Liljeberg RL: Measurement of effective pedicle diameter in the human spine. Orthopedics 12:939-942, 1989 2. Barr SJ, Schuette AM, Emans JB: Lumbar pedicle screws versus hooks. Results in double major curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:1369-1379, 1997 3. Belmont PJ, Jr., Klemme WR, Dhawan A, Polly DW, Jr.: In vivo accuracy of thoracic pedicle screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:2340-2346, 2001 4. Berry JL, Moran JM, Berg WS, Steffee AD: A morphometric study of human lumbar and selected thoracic vertebrae. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 12:362-367, 1987 5. Brown CA, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Geideman WM, Hasan SA, Blanke K: Complications of pediatric thoracolumbar and lumbar pedicle screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:1566-1571, 1998 6. Cinotti G, Gumina S, Ripani M, Postacchini F: Pedicle instrumentation in the thoracic spine. A morphometric and cadaveric study for placement of screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:114-119, 1999 7. Ebraheim NA, Rollins JR, Jr., Xu R, Yeasting RA: Projection of the lumbar pedicle and its morphometric analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:1296-1300, 1996 8. Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Ahmad M, Yeasting RA: Projection of the thoracic pedicle and its morphometric analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:233-238, 1997 9. Faraj AA, Webb JK: Early complications of spinal pedicle screw. Eur Spine J 6:324-326, 1997 10. Ferree BA: Morphometric characteristics of pedicles of the immature spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 17:887-891, 1992 11. Hicks JM, Singla A, Shen FH, Arlet V: Complications of pedicle screw fixation in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:E465-470 12. Hou S, Hu R, Shi Y: Pedicle morphology of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine in a Chinese population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18:1850-1855, 1993 13. Kakkos SK, Shepard AD: Delayed presentation of aortic injury by pedicle screws: report of two cases and review of the literature. J Vasc Surg 47:1074-1082, 2008 14. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cheh G, Riew KD: Evaluation of pedicle screw placement in the deformed spine using intraoperative plain radiographs: a comparison with computerized tomography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2084-2088, 2005 15. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cho SK, Bridwell KH, Sides B, Blanke K: Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:2040-2048, 2004 16. Lehman RA, Jr., Lenke LG, Keeler KA, Kim YJ, Cheh G: Computed tomography evaluation of pedicle screws placed in the pediatric deformed spine over an 8-year period. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2679-2684, 2007 17. Li B, Jiang B, Fu Z, Zhang D, Wang T: Accurate determination of isthmus of lumbar pedicle: a morphometric study using reformatted computed tomographic images. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:2438-2444, 2004 18. Liljenqvist U, Hackenberg L, Link T, Halm H: Pullout strength of pedicle screws versus pedicle and laminar hooks in the thoracic spine. Acta Orthop Belg 67:157-163, 2001 19. Misenhimer GR, Peek RD, Wiltse LL, Rothman SL, Widell EH, Jr.: Anatomic analysis of pedicle cortical and cancellous diameter as related to screw size. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14:367-372, 1989 20. Mulpuri K, Perdios A, Reilly CW: Evidence-based medicine analysis of all pedicle screw constructs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:S109-114, 2007 21. O'Brien MF, Lenke LG, Mardjetko S, Lowe TG, Kong Y, Eck K, et al: Pedicle morphology in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: is pedicle fixation an anatomically viable technique? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:2285-2293, 2000 22. Olsewski JM, Simmons EH, Kallen FC, Mendel FC, Severin CM, Berens DL: Morphometry of the lumbar spine: anatomical perspectives related to transpedicular fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:541-549, 1990 23. Ranade A, Samdani AF, Williams R, Barne K, McGirt MJ, Ramos G, et al: Feasibility and accuracy of pedicle screws in children younger than eight years of age. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:2907-2911, 2009 24. Robertson PA, Stewart NR: The radiologic anatomy of the lumbar and lumbosacral pedicles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:709-715, 2000 25. Rose PS, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Mulconrey DS, Cronen GA, Buchowski JM, et al: Pedicle screw instrumentation for adult idiopathic scoliosis: an improvement over hook/hybrid fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:852-857; discussion 858, 2009 26. Ruf M, Harms J: Pedicle screws in 1- and 2-year-old children: technique, complications, and effect on further growth. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:E460-466, 2002 27. Senaran H, Yazici M, Karcaaltincaba M, Alanay A, Acaroglu RE, Aksoy MC, et al: Lumbar pedicle morphology in the immature spine: a three-dimensional study using spiral computed tomography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:2472-2476, 2002 28. Sokolic J, Sosa T, Ugljen R, Biocina B, Simunic S, Slobodnjak Z: Extrinsic erosion of the descending aorta by a vertebral fixator. Tex Heart Inst J 18:136- 139, 1991 29. Suk SI, Lee CK, Kim WJ, Chung YJ, Park YB: Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20:1399- 1405, 1995 30. Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Allardyce TJ, Ramsey M, Salvo J, Balderston RA, et al: Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part I: Morphometric analysis of the thoracic vertebrae. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1193-1199, 1995 31. Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Balderston RA, Allardyce TJ, Garfin SR, Dolinskas C, et al: Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part II: An anatomical and radiographic assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1200-1206, 1995 32. Viswanathan A, Relyea K, Whitehead WE, Curry DJ, Luerssen TG, Jea A: Pneumothorax complicating "in-out-in" thoracic pedicle screw placement for kyphotic deformity correction in a child. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2:379-384, 2008 33. Wegener B, Birkenmaier C, Fottner A, Jansson V, Durr HR: Delayed perforation of the aorta by a thoracic pedicle screw. Eur Spine J 17 Suppl 2:S351-354, 2008 34. Yilmaz G, Demirkiran G, Ozkan C, Daglioglu K, Pekmezci M, Alanay A, et al: The effect of dilation of immature pedicles on pullout strength of the screws: Part 2: In vivo study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:2378-2383, 2009 35. Zindrick MR, Knight GW, Sartori MJ, Carnevale TJ, Patwardhan AG, Lorenz MA: Pedicle morphology of the immature thoracolumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:2726-2735, 2000 36. Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Doornik A, Widell EH, Knight GW, Patwardhan AG, et al: Analysis of the morphometric characteristics of the thoracic and lumbar pedicles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 12:160-166, 1987

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy