Skip to main content
  • The Comparison of Early Results of Three Operational Methods in 138 Children with Non-syndromic Craniosynostosis: Trans-sutural Distraction Osteogenesis, Rotating Distraction Osteogenesis and Conventi

    Final Number:
    959

    Authors:
    Soo Han Yoon MD; She-Hyuck Park; Dong Ha Park

    Study Design:
    Clinical Trial

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2011 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Distraction osteogenesis for the treatment of craniosynostosis is increasing as it is simpler, fewer transfusions are required, and there is decreased incidence of complications though a secondary procedure is necessary. Here, we compare early results of three operational methods in 138 children with non-syndromic craniosynostosis.

    Methods: We compared 100 patients with trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis (TSuDO), 23 patients with rotating distraction osteogenesis (RDO) and 15 patients who received conventional craniotomy and remodeling (CR). The TSuDO consisted of simple suturectomy of the pathologic suture followed by direct distraction while the RDO comprised of suturectomy of the pathologic suture, and resection of the bone flap to allow wide suture separation for distraction and open-door rotation.

    Results: The mean operation duration in the TSuDO group was 117.5 ± 50.48 minutes, which was significantly shorter than 255.9 ± 97.8 minutes for the RDO group or the 414.0 ± 106.9 minutes for the CR group (p<0.01). The mean transfusion volume of red blood cell in the TSuDO group was 98.4 ± 90.4 ml, which was significantly smaller than 329.8 ± 214.1 ml for the RDO group or the 451.9 ± 339.2 ml for the CR group (p<0.01). Perioperative complications comprised of 1 case (1%) of transient cranial nerve palsy, 4 cases (4%) of distractor breakage and 6 cases (6%) of minimal pus discharge in the TSuDO group, 2 cases (8.6%) of distractor breakage and 2 cases (8.6%) of minimal pus discharge in the RDO group, and 1 case (6.7%) of postoperative epidural hematoma and 1 case (6.7%) of spontaneous bone fracture in the CR group.

    Conclusions: We suggest that TSuDO may be the safest and most efficient method for treating children with craniosynostosis by expanding the intracranial volume and correcting abnormal skull contour shapes especially in young children less than 2 years.

    Patient Care: We try to find the best operational method which will improve patient safety and care.

    Learning Objectives: TSuDO may be the safest and most efficient method for treating children with craniosynostosis especially in young children less than 2 years.

    References: 1. Barone CM, Ferder M, Jimenez DF, Grossman L, Hall C, Strauch B, Argamaso RV: Distraction of the frontal bone outside the cranial plane: a rabbit model. J Craniofac Surg 1993;4:177-181. 2. Chin M, Toth BA: Le Fort III advancement with gradual distraction using internal devices. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;100:819-830. 3. Cohen SR, Rutrick R, Burstein FD: Distraction osteogenesis in the human craniofacial skeleton: initial experience with new distraction system. J Craniofac Surg 1995;6:368-374. 4. Hirabayashi S, Sugawara Y, Sakurai A, Harii K, Park S: Frontoorbital advancement by gradual distraction. J Neurosurg 1998;89:1058-1061. 5. Polley JW, Figueroa AA: Management of severe maxillary deficiency in childhood and adolescence through distraction osteogenesis with an external, adjustable, rigid distraction device. J Craniofac Surg 1997;8:181-185. 6. Akai T, Iizuka H, Kawakami S: Treatment of craniosynostosis by distraction osteogenesis. Pediatr Neurosurg 2006;42:288-292. 7. Chung J, Yoon SH: Rotating distraction osteogenesis in a child with secondary craniosyntostosis. J Craniofac Surg 2006;17:557-560. 8. Hirabayashi S, Sugawara Y, Sakurai A, Tachi M, Harii K, Sato S: Fronto-orbital advancement by distraction: the latest modification. Ann Plast Surg 2002;49:447-450. 9. Imai K, Komune H, Toda C, Nomachi T, Enoki E, Sakamoto H, Kitano S, Hatoko M, Fujimoto T: Cranial remodeling to treat craniosynostosis by gradual distraction using a new device. J Neurosurg 2002;96:654-659. 10. Komuro Y, Yanai A, Hayashi A, Nakanishi H, Miyajima M, Arai H: Cranial reshaping employing distraction and contraction in the treatment of sagittal synostosis. British J Plast Surg 2005;58:196-201. 11. Nonaka Y, Oi S, Miyawaki T, Shinoda A, Kurihara K: Indication for and surgical outcomes of the distraction method in various types of craniosynostosis. Advantages, disadvantages, and current concepts for surgical strategy in the treatment of craniosynostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 2004;20:702-709. 12. Yano H, Tanaka K, Sueyoshi O, Takahashi K, Hirata R, Hirano A: Cranial vault distraction: its illusionary effect and limitation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117:193-200. 13. Kim SW, Shim KW, Plesnila N, Kim YO, Choi JU, Kim DS: Distraction vs remodeling surgery for craniosynostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 2007;23:201-206. 14. Pearson GD, Havlik RJ, Eppley B, Nykiel M, Sadove AM: Craniosynostosis: a single institution's outcome assessment from surgical reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg 2008;19:65-71. 15. Choi JW, Koh KS, Hong JP, Hong SH, Ra Y: One-piece frontoorbital advancement with distraction but without a supraorbital bar for coronal craniosynostosis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009;62:1166-1173. 16. Christophis P, Jünger TH, Howaldt HP: Surgical correction of scaphocephaly: experiences with a new procedure and follow-up investigations. J Maxillofac Surg 2001;29:33-38. 17. Nishimoto S, Oyama T, Nagashima T, Shimizu F, Tsugawa T, Takeda M, Toda N: Gradual distraction fronto-orbital advancement with 'floating forehead' for patients with syndromic craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 2006;17:497-505. 18. Sikorski CW, Iteld L, McKinnon M, Yamini B, Frim DM: Correction of sagittal craniosynostosis using a novel parietal bone fixation technique: results over a 10-year period. Pediatr Neurosurg 2007;43:19-24. 19. Esparza J, Hinojosa J: Complications in the surgical treatment of craniosynostosis and craniofacial syndromes: apropos of 306 transcranial procedures. Childs Nerv Syst 2008;24:1421-1430. 20. Foster KA, Frim DM, McKinnon M: Recurrence of synostosis following surgical repair of craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:70e-76e. 21. Selber JC, Brooks C, Kurichi JE, Temmen T, Sonnad SS, Whitaker LA : Long-term results following fronto-orbital reconstruction in nonsyndromic unicoronal synostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:251e-260e. 22. Sloan GM, Wells KC, Raffel C, McComb JG: Surgical treatment of craniosynostosis: outcome analysis of 250 consecutive patients. Pediatrics 1997;100:E2:1-9 23. Baumgartner JE, Teichgraeber JF, Waller AL, Grantcherova E, Gateno J, Xia JJ: Microscopic approach to craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 2005;16:997-1005. 24. Kaufman BA, Muszynski CA, Matthews A, Etter N: The circle of sagittal synostosis surgery. Semin Pediatr Neurol 2004;11:243-248. 25. Staffenberg DA, Wood RJ, McCarthy JG, Grayson BH, Glasberg SB: Midface distraction advancement in the canine without osteotomies. Ann Plast Surg 1995;34:512-517. 26. Jane JA, Edgerton MT, Futrell JW, Park TS: Immediate correction of sagittal synostosis. J Neurosurg 1978;49:705-710. 27. Lauritzen C, Sugawara Y, Kocabalkan O, Olsson R: Spring mediated dynamic craniofacial reshaping. Case report. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1998;32:331-338. 28. do Amaral CM, Di Domizio G, Tiziani V, Galhardi F, Buzzo CL, Rinco T, Kharmandayan P, Bueno MA, Bolzani N, Sabbatini RM, Lopes LD, Lopes PF, Paiva B, Paiva RM, Turchiari LA: Gradual bone distraction in craniosynostosis. Preliminary results in seven cases. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1997;31:25-37. 29. Guimarães-Ferreira J, Gewalli F, David L, Olsson R, Friede H, Lauritzen CG: Spring-mediated cranioplasty compared with the modified pi-plasty for sagittal synostosis. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2003;37:208-215. 30. Windh P, Davis C, Sanger C, Sahlin P, Lauritzen C: Spring-assisted cranioplasty vs pi-plasty for sagittal synostosis--a long term follow-up study. J Craniofac Surg 2008;19:59-64. 31. Greene CS Jr, Winston KR: Treatment of scaphocephaly with sagittal craniectomy and biparietal morcellation. Neurosurg 1988;23:196-202. 32. Ocampo RV, Persing JA: Sagittal synostosis. Clinics in plastic surgery. J Craniofac Surg 1994;21:563-574. 33. Olds MV, Storrs B, Walker ML: Surgical treatment of sagittal synostosis. Neurosurg 1986;18:345-347. 34. Fearon JA, Ruotolo RA, Kolar JC: Single sutural craniosynostoses: surgical outcomes and long-term growth. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;123:635-642. 35. Panchal J, Uttchin V: Management of craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;111:2032-2048. 36. Smyth MD, Tenenbaum MJ, Kaufman CB, Kane AA: The "clamshell" craniotomy technique in treating sagittal craniosynostosis in older children. J Neurosurg 2006;105:245-451. 37. Vollmer DG, Jane JA, Park TS, Persing GA: Variants of sagittal synostosis. Strategies for surgical correction. J Neurosurg 1984;61:557-562. 38. Jimenez DF, Barone CM: Endoscopic craniectomy for early surgical correction of sagittal craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg 1998;88:77-81. 39. Jiminez DF, Barone CM, Cartwright CC, Baker L: Early management of craniosynostosis using endoscopic-assisted strip craniectomies and cranial orthotic molding therapy. Pediatrics 2002;110:97-104. 40. Bertelsen TI: The premature synostosis of the cranial sutures. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl 1958;36:1-176. 41. Burdi AR, Kusnetz AB, Venes JL, Gebarski SS: The natural history and pathogenesis of the cranial coronal ring articulations: Implications in understanding the pathogenesis of the Crouzon craniostenotic defects. Cleft Palate J 1986;23:28-39. 42. Dundulis JA, Becker DB, Govier DP, Marsh JL, Kane AA: Coronal ring involvement in patients treated for unilateral coronal craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114:1695-1703. 43. Rogers GF, Mulliken JB: Involvement of the basilar coronal ring in unilateral coronal synostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;115:1887-1893. 44. Cho BC, Hwang SK, Uhm KI: Distraction osteogenesis of the cranial vault for the treatment of craniofacial synostosis. J Craniofac Surg 2004;15:135-144. 45. Becker DB, Fundakowski CE, Govier DP, Deleon VB, Marsh JL, Kane AA: Long-term osseous morphologic outcome of surgically treated unilateral coronal craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117:929-935. 46. Williams JK, Cohen SR, Burstein FD, Hudgins R, Boydston W, Simms C: A longitudinal, statistical study of reoperation rates in craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;100:305-310. 47. Gosain AK, Santoro TD, Havlik RJ, Cohen SR, Holmes RE: Midface distraction following Le Fort III and monobloc osteotomies: problems and solutions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:1797-1808. 48. Lee JA, Park DH, Yoon SH, Chung J: Distractor breakage in cranial distraction osteogenesis for children with craniosynostosis. Pediatr Neurosurg 2008;44:216-20. 49. Pelo S, Gasparini G, Di Petrillo A, Tamburrini G, Di Rocco C: Distraction osteogenesis in the surgical treatment of craniostenosis: a comparison of internal and external craniofacial distractor devices. Childs Nerv Syst 2007;23:1447-1453. 50. Uemura T, Hayashi T, Satoh K, Mitsukawa N, Yoshikawa A, Suse T, Furukawa Y: Three-dimensional cranial expansion using distraction osteogenesis for oxycephaly. J Craniofacial Surg 2003;14:29-36. 51. Yonehara Y, Hirabayashi S, Sugawara Y, Sakurai A, Harii K: Complications associated with gradual cranial vault distraction osteogenesis for the treatment of craniofacial synostosis. J Craniofac Surg 2003;14:526-528.

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy