Skip to main content
  • Current Trends in the Management of Acoustic Neuroma in the United States: Are We Over Treating?

    Final Number:

    Tsz Lau MD; Raul Olivera MD; Puya Alikhani MD, BS; Harry R. Van Loveren MD; Siviero Agazzi MD, MBA

    Study Design:

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2011 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: A growing body of evidence suggests that a significant percentage of acoustic tumors do not grow and observation is now advocated as a viable option also in young patients. It is still unknown however, how these new data on the natural history of vestibular schwannomas has impacted management decisions in North America.

    Methods: Data were downloaded using the SEER*Stat software from the 2007 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database. This database is maintained by the National Cancer Institute and represents 26% of the United States population. Cases were isolated based on the ICD-O-3 histology code (9560/0 and 9570/0) and site code (C72.4). Data from 2004-2007 were included. Tumor incidence was calculated using the US Census Bureau's Population Estimates Program. The number of patients undergoing surgical resection was compared to the number of patients treated with beam radiation based on the tumor size (<2cm, 2-4 cm,>4cm).

    Results: A total of 3650 cases were identified from the database. The overall annual incidence of acoustic neuromas remained unchanged (1.3 per 100,000 in 2004 to 1.1 per 100,000 in 2007).Over the study period, management choices of acoustic neuromas showed a significant change only for tumors <2cm (p=0.014). The percentage of patients undergoing observation, radiation, and surgical resection was 16.7%, 22.5%, and 60.8% respectively in 2004; 21.1%, 22%, and 56.9% in 2005; 21.3%, 27.3%, and 51.4% in 2006; and 20.8%, 27.9%, and 51.3% in 2007.

    Conclusions: Our study demonstrates a shift in the management of small acoustic neuromas in the United States between 2004 and 2007 with microsurgical resection giving way to radiation in small tumors while overall rate for observation remained stable. With recent literature suggesting that the majority of small tumors do not grow, it will be interesting to see if the next shift will be from intervention to observation.

    Patient Care: To make surgeons aware that the vast majority of acoustic neuromas are still being treated, either with radiosurgery or surgical resection in the United States. With the majority of small tumors still being treated while recent literature indicates that most are not growing, it may be possible we are currently over treating patients with acoustic neuromas.

    Learning Objectives: To understand the current treatment trends of acoustic neuroma in the United States.

    References: 1.Hirsch A, Noren G. Audiological findings after stereotactic radiosurgery in acoustic neurinomas. Acta Otolaryngol. Sep-Oct 1988;106(3-4):244-251. 2.Hirsch A, Noren G. Audiologic findings after stereotactic radiosurgery in acoustic neurinomas. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1988;449:17. 3.Hirsch A, Noren G, Anderson H. Audiologic findings after stereotactic radiosurgery in nine cases of acoustic neurinomas. Acta Otolaryngol. 1979;88(3-4):155-160. 4.Noren G, Arndt J, Hindmarsh T. Stereotactic radiosurgery in cases of acoustic neurinoma: further experiences. Neurosurgery. Jul 1983;13(1):12-22. 5.Tos M, Stangerup SE, Caye-Thomasen P, Tos T, Thomsen J. What is the real incidence of vestibular schwannoma? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Feb 2004;130(2):216-220. 6.Stangerup SE, Caye-Thomasen P, Tos M, Thomsen J. The natural history of vestibular schwannoma. Otol Neurotol. Jun 2006;27(4):547-552. 7.Myrseth E, Moller P, Pedersen PH, Lund-Johansen M. Vestibular schwannoma: surgery or gamma knife radiosurgery? A prospective, nonrandomized study. Neurosurgery. Apr 2009;64(4):654-661; discussion 661-653. 8.Pollock BE, Driscoll CL, Foote RL, et al. Patient outcomes after vestibular schwannoma management: a prospective comparison of microsurgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery. Neurosurgery. Jul 2006;59(1):77-85; discussion 77-85. 9.Propp JM, McCarthy BJ, Davis FG, Preston-Martin S. Descriptive epidemiology of vestibular schwannomas. Neuro Oncol. Jan 2006;8(1):1-11. 10.Gal TJ, Shinn J, Huang B. Current epidemiology and management trends in acoustic neuroma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. May 2010;142(5):677-681. 11.Stangerup SE, Tos M, Thomsen J, Caye-Thomasen P. True incidence of vestibular schwannoma? Neurosurgery. Nov 2010;67(5):1335-1340; discussion 1340. 12.Pulec JL, Giannotta SL. Acoustic neuroma surgery in patients over 65 years of age. Ear Nose Throat J. Jan 1995;74(1):21-27.

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy