Skip to main content
  • Need for Instrumented Spinal Fixation Subsequent to Resection of Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors in a Pediatric Population: A Single Institution Experience

    Final Number:

    David Andrew Chesler MD, PhD; Courtney Pendleton; Jose Undabeitia BA, MD, PhD; George I. Jallo MD, FACS

    Study Design:
    Clinical Trial

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2011 Annual Meeting

    Introduction: Intramedullary spinal cord tumors (IMSCTs) represent approximately 5% of all central nervous system neoplasms in pediatric populations. In addition to the challenges of achieving maximal resection of IMSCTs while preserving neurologic function, consideration must be given to the risk of progressive kyphotic deformity necessitating subsequent spinal instrumentation. A review of the literature suggests 5-61% of pediatric patients undergoing resection of IMSCTs require subsequent spinal instrumentation.

    Methods: Following IRB approval, a retrospective chart review was conducted to identify all pediatric patients carrying a diagnosis of IMSCT, and operated upon by a single institution from 2003 to 2010. Analysis was undertaken to identify independent variables associated with the need for spinal instrumentation for progressive deformity following resection of IMSCTs.

    Results: 43 patients under 18 years of age (mean 10.7 years) underwent resection of IMSCT by a single surgeon at a single academic tertiary care center between 2003 and 2010. Mean length of follow-up was 15.4 months. Seventeen patients (39.5%) had prior operations by outside surgeons. Five patients required instrumentation (11.6%), of which four had prior operations by an outside surgeon. In comparison, one patient of twenty-six, whose first operation was with the single surgeon in this study, required subsequent instrumentation (3.85%). These findings were independent of patient age, pathologic diagnosis, segmental length of exposure (median 4 [non-instrumented] vs 6 [instrumented] levels), laminectomy (0.2 vs 0.1%), laminoplasty (0.1 vs 0.2%), or pre-existing spinal deformity (0.7 versus 0.3%). There was, however, a 6x higher incidence of instrumentation among patients undergoing previous surgery (RR 6.11); this was not statistically significant (95% CI 0.75-50.1).

    Conclusions: Although the results do not provide statistically significant predictors of the need for spinal instrumentation to address progressive kyphotic deformities following resection of IMSCTs, they indicate a trend towards greater preserved spinal stability in the hands of surgeons at high volume centers.

    Patient Care: IMSCTs remain a rare clinical entity among pediatric populations. This study suggests that the risks of progressive spinal deformity and subsequent spinal instrumentation require that these patients be referred to, and treated by, neurosurgeons with extensive experience with resecting similar lesions.

    Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1) Describe the risks of progressive spine deformity and spinal instrumentation following resection of IMSCTs, 2) Discuss the potential association between multiple operations and progressive spinal deformity in pediatric patients treated for IMSCT, 3) Discuss the potential benefits to creating centers of excellence which provide operative resection of IMSCTs at high volume centers.


We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy