Skip to main content
  • Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Computed Tomography Analysis of Lead Position Between Three-column and Five-column Paddle Leads Spinal Cord Stimulation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

    Final Number:

    Sangwoo Ha; Byungchul Son

    Study Design:
    Clinical Trial

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: 2016 ASSFN Biennial Meeting Late Breaking

    Introduction: The authors investigated the difference in clinical outcome and the position of paddle lead spinal cord stimulation (SCS) between three-column and five-column paddle lead SCS in patients with FBSS

    Methods: In 21 patientswho underwent paddle lead SCS at T9 (three-column [n=12] and five-column [n=9]) for FBSS, a 12-month follow-up numerical rating scale, percent pain relief, and CT assessment of contact angle and percent reduction of T9 canal areawere investigated.

    Results: There was no difference in paresthesia coverage of the painful area, trial success rate, clinical outcomes, and percent pain relief between the two groups(p>0.05).Although there was no statistical difference in the contact angles, the contact angle in the five-column group was generally greater than that of the three-column group (p=0.067). Overall reduction of 35.51 ± 4.76% in the T9 canal was observed and there was no difference between two groups (p>0.05) and no correlation between the contact angle and percent T9 spinal canal reduction (r = -0.247,p>0.05).

    Conclusions: There was no difference in clinical efficacy of SCS using three and five-column paddle lead. Significant inclination of paddle lead in posterior epidural space and significant reduction in T9 canal area were observed.

    Patient Care: This presentation would be of help for neurosurgeons to place correctly in T8/9 epidural space

    Learning Objectives: to provide a real location of paddle lead for T8,9 epidural space and to help physicians to enhance the performance of paddle lead insertion and patient programming.

    References: 1.Son B, Kim D, Lee S, Chough C. Factors associated with the success of trial spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic pain from failed back surgery syndrome. J KorNeurosurgSoc 2013;54:501-506. 2.Struijik JJ, Holsheimer J, Spincemaille GHJ, Gielen FLH, Hoekema R. Theoretical performance and clinical evaluation of transverse tripolar spinal cord stimulation. IEEE Trans RehabilEng 1998;6:277-283.

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy