In gratitude of the loyal support of our members, the CNS is offering complimentary 2021 Annual Meeting registration to all members! Learn more.

  • Can we predict long-term disability and discharge destination after elective cervical spine surgery?

    Final Number:
    235

    Authors:
    Ahilan Sivaganesan MD; Silky Chotai MD; Matthew J. McGirt MD; Clint Devin MD

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:
    Spine

    Meeting: Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves Spine Summit- 2017

    Introduction: We introduce predictive models for clinically meaningful improvement in disability, as well as discharge destination, after elective cervical spine surgery (CSS).

    Methods: 430 patients undergoing CSS were enrolled into a prospective registry. LOESS regression was performed to verify the appropriateness of linear regression. A vast array of patient- and diagnosis-related variables were used to power a multivariate regression model for NDI. Possible interactions were also accounted for. We then used Repeated Random Sub-Sampling to validate the performance of our model. A separate logistic regression model was constructed to predict a clinically important improvement in NDI at one year. A third model was similarly developed and validated to predict post-surgery discharge destination (home versus facility).

    Results: Our predictive model for 12-month NDI has an R-squared of 0.69 (Figure 1), and in validation, it achieved an R-squared of 0.43. The predictors, in descending order of influence, are: employment, baseline NDI, diagnosis, smoking, ethnicity, claudication, narcotic use, and symptom duration. Our model for achieving a MCID in NDI has an AUC greater than 0.80 for the development phase and an AUC of 0.65 in validation. The predictors are: baseline NDI, motor deficit, depression, ambulation, revision surgery, employment, diagnosis, smoking, and symptom duration. Finally, our predictive model for discharge destination has an AUC greater than 0.80 for the development phase and an AUC of 0.75 for the validation phase (Figure 2). The predictors are: baseline EQ-5D, number of levels, myelopathy, depression, baseline NDI, and motor deficit.

    Conclusions: We present validated models that help predict disability at one year and discharge destination after elective CSS. Our NDI model explains roughly 70% of the variation in 12-month disability. Our model for discharge destination has strong predictive accuracy, and can become a useful tool as neurosurgeons seek to better understand patients' post-operative trajectories.

    Patient Care: The predictive models presented here can form the foundation for decision-support tools which help neurosurgeons offer elective cervical spine surgery specifically to those patients who are likely to experience long-term benefit. The models will also help neurosurgeons risk-stratify patients with respect to post-discharge resource utilization, which will be crucial with the advent of value-based purchasing and 90-day bundled payments.

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1) Describe the importance of variability in patient-reported outcomes after elective cervical spine surgery; 2) Identify drivers of long-term post-operative neck-related disability; and 3) Describe factors which influence post-operative discharge destination.

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy