On October 1, 2021 the CNS is proud to announce a new and improved user experience for all your SANS education needs. You’ll retain access to any current subscriptions
but answers on exams won’t transfer over - so make sure you complete any exams and claim credit by September 30 or start the new SANS 2021 today

  • Addition of Fusion to Decompression for Grade I Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Is Associated with Greater Patient-Reported Outcome Improvements at 24-Month Follow-up: A Multicenter Study Using

    Final Number:
    113

    Authors:
    Jian Guan MD; Erica Fay Bisson MD MPH

    Study Design:
    Clinical Research

    Subject Category:
    Spine: Open Surgery

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2019 Annual Meeting

    Introduction:

    Extensive investigation has not ascertained the ideal surgical management of grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis. Using the large, multicenter, prospectively collected Quality Outcomes Database (QOD), we compared 24-month outcomes for patients undergoing decompression alone versus decompression and fusion.

    Methods:

    Patients undergoing single-level surgery from 7/1/2014 through 6/30/2016 were identified. The primary outcome measure, 24-month Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) change, was analyzed with univariate and multivariable linear regression. EQ-5D scores, numerical rating scale (NRS) back and leg pain scores, and North American Spine Society patient satisfaction scores were also analyzed.

    Results:

    Of the 608 patients (85.5% with at least 24-month follow-up) who met the inclusion criteria, 140 (23.0%) underwent decompression alone and 468 (77.0%) underwent decompression and fusion. The 24-month change in ODI was significantly greater in the fusion group than the decompression-only group (-25.8±20.0 vs. -15.2±19.8, p<0.001). Fusion remained independently associated with 24-month ODI change in our multivariable model (B=-7.05, 95% CI 10.70 to 3.39, p=<0.001). Patients in the fusion group were significantly more likely to reach minimal clinically important difference (MCID, 12.8 points) in ODI at 24 months (73.3% vs. 56.0%, p=<0.001), and to experience significantly greater NRS back pain improvement at 24-month follow-up ( 3.8±3.1 vs. -1.8±3.9, p<0.001). Fusion was also independently associated with achieving MCID for ODI at 24 months in our logistic regression model (OR 1.767, 95% CI 1.058-2.944, p=0.029).

    Conclusions:

    The results of our study suggest that decompression plus fusion may offer superior outcomes to decompression alone in patients with grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis at 24 months. Longer-term follow-up is warranted to assess whether this effect is sustained.

    Patient Care:

    Lumbar spondylolisthesis is a prevalent problem and a common condition treated by neurosurgeons. By examining surgical approach in a multi-center study with robust followup, our study will aid in surgical decision making in the management of these patients.

    Learning Objectives:

    By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1) Describe the importance of surgical approach for management of grade I spondylolisthesis. 2) Discuss, in small groups, the advantages and disadvantages of fusion for the management of grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis. 3) Identify an effective treatment for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis.

    References:

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy