Skip to main content
  • A comparison of external ventricular drain placement accuracy and safety done by midlevel practitioners and Neurosurgeons.

    Final Number:
    4082

    Authors:
    Sanjay Earl Patra MD, MSc; Nathaniel R Ellens BA; Luke Fisher PhD; Brett Schroeder; Jason Meldau BS

    Study Design:
    Other

    Subject Category:

    Meeting: Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2017 Annual Meeting - Late Breaking Science

    Introduction: External ventricular drains (EVD) are used frequently for the monitoring and treatment of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) in neurosurgical patients with acute intracranial pathologies: including traumatic brain injury, hemorrhage, obstructive hydrocephalus or other causes of cerebral edema.The purpose of this study is to perform a retrospective chart review to evaluate the accuracy and complications—hemorrhage and infection—following EVD placement by Mid level providers (MLPs) and Neurosurgeons.

    Methods: We performed a retrospective review for all patients with an EVD placed between January 2012 and September 2016 at a level 1 trauma center. We compared safety and accuracy of EVD placement between senior neurosurgeons and MLPs. Accuracy was determined by spontaneous flow of CSF from EVD and a post operative CT scan showing the catheter tip within the lateral or third ventricle.

    Results: MLP first attempted EVD placement in 238 patients and senior neurosurgeon first attempted EVD placement in 70 subjects. There was no significant difference between accuracy of placement within the ventricle, (87.4% vs 91.4%, p = 0.437136), hemorrhage rate (5.9% vs 4.3%, p = 0.77, or infection rate (0.8% vs 1.4%, p = 0.5399) for placement attempted by a MLP compared to a senior neurosurgeon, respectively.

    Conclusions: With a rigorous standardized training program, MLP performed EVD placement safely with no significant difference in accuracy of placement or complication rates compared with placement by senior neurosurgeons. This may allow for earlier management of elevated intracranial pressure and access to care where previously unavailable; leading to improved patient outcomes.

    Patient Care: It will validate the use of midlevel providers for placement of EVDs. This will potentially allow more rapid access to care for patients presenting to non-academic centers and regions where direct access to senior neurosurgeons is more limited

    Learning Objectives: By the conclusion of this session participants should be able to: 1. identify what the acceptable level of complications are during external ventricular drain (EVD) placement. 2. determine if mid level providers can safely and accurately place EVDs. 3. determine what an acceptable level of supervision is prior to letting mid level providers place EVDs on their own

    References: 1. Marshall LF, Smith RW, Shapiro HM. The outcome with aggressive treatment in severe head injuries. Part I: the significance of intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurosurg. 1979;50(1):20-25. 2. Roitberg BZ, Khan N, Alp MS, Hersonskey T, Charbel FT, Ausman JI. Bedside external ventricular drain placement for the treatment of acute hydrocephalus. Br J Neurosurg. 2001;15(4):324-327. 3. Saul TG, Ducker TB. Effect of intracranial pressure monitoring and aggressive treatment on mortality in severe head injury. J Neurosurg. 1982;56(4):498-503. 4. Ekeh AP, Ilyas S, Saxe JM, et al. Successful placement of intracranial pressure monitors by trauma surgeons. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(2):286-291. 5. Harris CH, Smith RS, Helmer SD, Gorecki JP, Rody RB. Placement of Intracranial Pressure Monitors by Non-Neurosurgeons. Am Surg. 2002;68(9):787-790. 6. Sadaka F, Kasal J, Lakshmanan R, Palagiri A. Placement of intracranial pressure monitors by neurointensivists: case series and a systematic review. Brain Inj. 2013;27(5):600-604. 7. Kaups KL, Parks SN, Morris CL. Intracranial pressure monitor placement by midlevel practitioners. J Trauma. 1998;45(5):884-886. 8. Young PJ, Bowling WM. Midlevel practitioners can safely place intracranial pressure monitors. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(2):431-434. 9. Guyot L, Dowling C, Diaz FG, Michael DB. Cerebral monitoring devices: analysis of complications. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 1998;71:47-49. 10. Lo CH, Spelman D, Bailey M, Cooper DJ, Rosenfeld J V, Brecknell JE. External ventricular drain infections are independent of drain duration: an argument against elective revision. J Neurosurg. 2007;106(3):378-383. 11. Narayan RK, Kishore PR, Becker DP, et al. Intracranial pressure: to monitor or not to monitor? A review of our experience with severe head injury. J Neurosurg. 1982;56(5):650-659. 12. Maniker AH, Vaynman AY, Karimi RJ, Sabit AO, Holland B. Hemorrhagic complications of external ventricular drainage. Neurosurgery. 2006;59(4 SUPPL. 2):419-425. 13. Wiesmann M, Mayer TE. Intracranial bleeding rates associated with two methods of external ventricular drainage. J Clin Neurosci. 2001;8(2):126-128. 14. Saladino A, White JB, Wijdicks EFM, Lanzino G. Malplacement of ventricular catheters by neurosurgeons: A single institution experience. Neurocrit Care. 2009;10(2):248-252. 15. Kakarla UK, Kim LJ, Chang SW, Theodore N, Spetzler RF. Safety and accuracy of bedside external ventricular drain placement. Neurosurgery. 2008;63(1 SUPPL.):162-167. 16. Holloway KL, Barnes T, Choi S, et al. Ventriculostomy infections: the effect of monitoring duration and catheter exchange in 584 patients. J Neurosurg. 1996;85(3):419-424. 17. Lyke KE, Obasanjo OO, Williams MA, O’Brien M, Chotani R, Perl TM. Ventriculitis complicating use of intraventricular catheters in adult neurosurgical patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33(12):2028-2033. 18. Kitchen WJ, Singh N, Hulme S, Galea J, Patel HC, King AT. External ventricular drain infection: improved technique can reduce infection rates. Br J Neurosurg. 2011;25(December 2010):632-635. 19. Lewis A, Czeisler BM, Lord AS. Variations in Strategies to Prevent Ventriculostomy-Related Infections: A Practice Survey. The Neurohospitalist. 2016;7(1):[Epub ahead of print]. 20. Sloffer CA, Augspurger L, Wagenbach A, Lanzino G. Antimicrobial-impregnated external ventricular catheters: Does the very low infection rate observed in clinical trials apply to daily clinical practice? Neurosurgery. 2005;56(5):1041-1043. 21. Foreman PM, Hendrix P, Griessenauer CJ, Schmalz PGR, Harrigan MR. External ventricular drain placement in the intensive care unit versus operating room: Evaluation of complications and accuracy. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015;128:94-100. 22. O’Neill BR, Velez DA, Braxton EE, Whiting D, Oh MY. A survey of ventriculostomy and intracranial pressure monitor placement practices. Surg Neurol. 2008;70(3):268-273. 23. Miller C, Tummala RP. Risk factors for hemorrhage associated with external ventricular drain placement and removal. J Neurosurg. 2017;126(1):289-297.

We use cookies to improve the performance of our site, to analyze the traffic to our site, and to personalize your experience of the site. You can control cookies through your browser settings. Please find more information on the cookies used on our site. Privacy Policy